The answer is A.<span>concurring opinion supports a Supreme Court ruling, while a dissenting opinion opposes it
In concurring opinion, the judges will support the the decision by the court but with different basis/reasonns for its support.
In dissenting opinion on the hand, the judges are disagree with the decision by the court, but it wouldn't affect the previous outcome.</span>
Answer:Job satisfaction
Explanation:Job satisfaction measures how content or not content people are with their day to day jobs.
This depends on various factors such wages, Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, age etc.
These factors can contribute to job satisfaction or dissatisfaction for example Intrinsic motivation, when someone works in a job that aligns well with what drives them in life or a job that aligns with their values they are very likely to be satisfied.
Some people also need things like being rewarded for the work they have done well which may give them satisfaction.
Employers can play the role as much as individuals play the role in job satisfaction by rewarding their employees , increasing their wages .
A deductive argument is one that the arguer wants to be deductively valid, that really is, to provide a guarantee that the conclusion is correct if the premises are correct.
This principle may alternatively be put as follows: in a deductive argument, the premises are designed to give such strong evidence for the conclusion that, if the premises are true, the conclusion cannot be wrong. A valid (deductively) argument is one in which the premises successfully ensure the conclusion. If a valid argument has true premises, it is also said to be sound. All arguments are either valid or invalid, and either sound or unsound; there is no such thing as being partially valid.
Therefore, the answer is deductive argument.
To know more about deductive argument click here:
brainly.com/question/1803030
#SPJ4
