1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vladimir2022 [97]
3 years ago
14

Summarize Arizona v Evans

Law
1 answer:
Strike441 [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

United States Supreme Court case in which the Court instituted an exclusionary rule exception allowing evidence obtained through a warrant less search to be valid when a police record erroneously indicates the existence of an outstanding warrant due to negligent conduct of a Clerk of Court.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Help me answer these please
erik [133]

Answer:

true true true true

Explanation:

it's true promise ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the 3 appendices?
dmitriy555 [2]
Appendix I
Appendix II
Appendix III
3 0
3 years ago
you are researching the effect of air pollution on human health.you find information from the following sources.which of these w
Anettt [7]

Answer:

Any sources related to industries that cause air pollution such as Oil refineries, cigarette companies, thermal electricity generating firms and the like.

Explanation:

A biased source in a subject usually has some sort of interest in it which is usually financial. This is why we'd expect cigarette companies to lie about the effects of smoking on the lungs.

It is the same thing here. You included no options but the biased source should be one that stands to benefit from misleading the public on the effects of air pollution on health so that people are less enraged and they can continue benefitting from their harmful activities.

7 0
3 years ago
Can I sue a teacher if they claim my work for themselves?
Mademuasel [1]
Yes that is plagiarism
8 0
3 years ago
Answer pl
garik1379 [7]

Tina has the right to sue the company that sold her the product arguing that it had been recalled as potentially dangerous to consumers and she should be compensated for the damages caused by the dryer.

<h3>What should Tina do?</h3>

Tina must seek help from the Federal Trade Commission, this institution is in charge of protecting consumers and promoting competition between companies.

Based on the foregoing, Tina can rely on this institution to sue the company that sold her the dryer because this product had been withdrawn from the market for being dangerous.

So the company that sold him the dryer was committing a crime for selling this object. Additionally, this company must compensate Tina for the damages caused by this product.

Learn more about consumer in: brainly.com/question/950909

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain the role of an expert witness and be sure to identify what the expert witness should not do.
    6·1 answer
  • True or False: How quickly other drugs reach the bloodstream varies depending upon how the drug is put into the system and the t
    11·1 answer
  • When Congress passes a law, it can be found in which publication? a. United States Congressional Studies b. United States Statut
    15·1 answer
  • -!Please help!-
    7·2 answers
  • Spaulding, a minor, is injured in an automobile accident. His guardian sues the driver. The insurance company provides Lawyer fo
    5·1 answer
  • Is impeachment strictly political? Explain
    5·1 answer
  • Late one Saturday evening , and Mark decide to a local.convenience store Mark has a loaded shotgun for the robbery , but both me
    14·1 answer
  • What core value is common to all U.S. Military services? *
    11·2 answers
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIST
    8·2 answers
  • Community Policing does which of the following? *
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!