Answer:
Habeas corpus.
Explanation:
Judicial power can be defined as the power given to the courts to act and pronounce judgment on a case after making a decision with respect to the parties that brought the case for litigation.
Therefore, when a judge with competent jurisdiction decides on an issue, his or her decision is final and can only be changed (upturned) by another court ruling.
This ultimately implies that, when a judge presiding over a court of competent jurisdiction gives a verdict or judgment on a case, his or her decision is final and can only be upturned by a higher court such as a court of appeal (appellate court) and supreme court.
A legal order for an investigation into whether a person who is arrested has been imprisoned legally defines habeas corpus.
Additionally, habeas corpus ensures protection for an individual from imprisonment without being charged legally with a crime. The individual reports his or her illegal (unlawful) imprisonment or detention to a court in order to regain freedom.
The foreign policy would have a strong nationalistic component, and alliances and treaties would only be formed when they were advantageous to American Indian policy.
<h3>What did alliances in World War 1 mean?</h3>
A WW1 alliance system. As previously established, the definition of alliances WW1 is a pact between a group of nations to aid one another in times of conflict. Before the conflict started, the alliance structure for WW1 was established. Some alliance systems go all the way back to the nineteenth century.
<h3>What kind of alliances are examples of?</h3>
One of the best examples of a strategic partnership is the agreement between Starbucks with Barnes & Noble. Coffee is brewed by Starbucks. Books can be found at Barnes & Noble. To a benefit of the both businesses, each one does what it does best while splitting the costs of the facility.
To know more about alliances visit:
brainly.com/question/28195787
#SPJ4
Answer:
How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?
What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?
Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!) pls keep it organized
Explanation:
