Answer:
Yes, -13 is less than f/2.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since we are given a fraction with a variable, it may seem hard at first to find out which number is greater.
First, we have to realise that -13 is a negative number. Any negative number is always equal to less than a positive number.
Whatever number we replace our variable f with, whether it be 2, 3, 9, or 0.00000000000001, we can rest assure that it will be a <em>positive</em> number.
Since positive numbers are greater than negative ones, -13 has to be less than f/2.
If the fraction was negative (- f/2), this would be a nearly impossible question to answer.
Answer:
t= 0.4933
t ≥ t ( 0.025 ,8 ) = 2.306
Since the calculated value of t= 0.4933 is less than t ( 0.025 ,8 ) = 2.306 therefore we accept the null hypothesis at 5 % significance level . On the basis of this we conclude that the book had no effect on their scores.
Step-by-step explanation:
We state our null and alternative hypotheses as
H0: ud= 0 Ha: ud≠0
The significance level is set at ∝= 0.05
The test statistic under H0 is
t= d`/ sd/√n
which has t distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom
The critical region is t ≥ t ( 0.025 ,8 ) = 2.306
Computations
Student Scores before Scores after Difference d²
reading book ( after minus before)
1 720 740 20 400
2 860 860 0 0
3 850 840 -10 100
4 880 920 40 1600
5 860 890 30 900
6 710 720 10 100
7 850 840 -10 100
8 1200 1240 40 1600
<u>9 950 970 20 40</u>
<u>∑ 6930 8020 140 4840</u>
d`= ∑d/n= 140/9= 15.566
sd²= 1/8( 4840- 140²/9) = 1/8 (4840 - 2177.778) = 2662.22/8= 332.775
sd= 18.2422
t= 3/ 18.2422/ √9
t= 0.4933
Since the calculated value of t= 0.4933 is less than t ( 0.025 ,8 ) = 2.306 therefore we accept the null hypothesis at 5 % significance level . On the basis of this we conclude that the book had no effect on their scores.
The answer is 2y<=3x+4
Mark me as brainliest if I helped! :D
Answer:
The correct answer is "the term number, n."
Step-by-step explanation:
