<span>f(x)=0 at
rounded up
-4.96
-1.1
1.1</span><span>
</span>
Yes her statement is correct i think well maybe it is because if you cut 3 rectangles in to 2 than you color in 5 and stop and draw a rectangle with 4 in 3 rectangles and color in 10 and the two has less shaded in so the one who ran more was beth cause if you put it into a mixed number it is 2 and 1/2 and May's mixed number is 2 and 2/4 and the dinominator 2 is greater than the dinominator 4 cause 2 has bigger pices and 4 has smaller pices
Answer:
-0.4x - 0.30 or 
Step-by-step explanation:
Change all the fractions to decimals.
-2/5 = -0.4 Distribute that over x and 0.8 1/50 = 0.02
you get -0.4x -0.32 + 0.02
Change all the decimals to fractions.
0.8 is 8/10 so -2/5 times 8/10 is -16/50
-2x/5 - 16/50 + 1/50 add or subtract the fractions to get -15/50 Then reduce (÷5)
-2x/5 - 3/10
Answer:
c. x/7
Step-by-step explanation:
seven is dividing something, and X is the placeholder in this equation.
So, since x is being divided by seven, that rules out B., because that's backwards.
A. and D. don't involve division, so they're both incorrect as well.
Thus we are left with C. x/7
