That statement IS arguable because not everyone would agree and also NOT defensible since theres no proof to back it up with, so the answer would be (D)
Answer: D is correct.
Explanation: laws of reason are mere fictions. Philosophy of rights is dedicated to this issue but in its very fundaments there are fundamental questions that are still not answered (becase both laws of nature and laws of reason are products of human intellect, i.e. they cannot be experimentally proved. In spite of its fictitious nature, theese laws became one of the pillars of Enlightenment. French philophers, for example, attempted to ground ethics on mathematics which proved to be inviable.
Answer:
Plantation labor
four million enslaved people in the U.S. in 1860, nine out of ten lived on farms and plantations (mostly cotton plantations), and half lived in the Deep South.
It was a prime spot, near teh water, and it connects Egypt and Mesopotamia
Answer:
It should be B
Explanation: he spoke out on the stamp act before he had anything to do with presedency, I wouldnt take this answer 100% but that is my best answer. hope this helps!