Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Answer:
The correct solution is "$42.94".
Explanation:
The given values are:
D0 = 4
Ks = 15%
As we know,
⇒ 


By using the Gordon Model, we get
⇒ 

($)
Assume that a change in government policy results in greater production of both consumer goods and investment goods. We can conclude that the economy was not employing all of its resources before the policy change.
Explanation:
Policies by government will affect economic growth
Government policies have a major role to play in encouraging (or deterring) economic growth. Economic policies that lead to economic growth include:
Investing in infrastructure:
Infrastructure, such as highways or bridges, is tangible capital available to all. Governments are increasing their capital stock in the country by investing in infrastructure.
Productivity and labor participation strategies :
Promoting a higher rate of labor participation, for example labor participation tax incentives, will lead to even more economic growth.
Policies promoting accumulation of capital and technological advancement:
Savings-enhancing strategies that lead to higher growth and thus capital investments. Strategies that encourage technological innovation, such as research and development tax credits, often lead to increased economic growth.
Answer: $1,695
Explanation:
GIVEN THE FOLLOWING ;
miscellaneous itemized deduction for the year;
Home office expenses = $1,200
Union dues and work uniforms = $350
Unreimbursed employee expenses = $415
Gambling losses to the extent of gambling winnings = $890.
Value of miscellaneous itemized deduction is :
Miscellaneous itemized deduction = [(Home office expenses + Union dues and work uniforms + Unreimbursed employee expenses) – 2 % of Adjusted Gross Income + Gambling losses to the extent of gamble winnings]
[($1,200 + $350 + $415) - (0.02 × 58,000) + $890]
[$1,965 - $1160 + $890]
$1,695
As the price of computers falls the quantity of computer demand increases. This is an application of the law of demand.
What do you understand by the Law of Demand?
According to the law of demand, pricing has an inverse relationship with the number of goods purchased. Alternatively said, the quantity requested decreases as the price increases. Decreasing marginal utility is what causes this.
What is the Law of Decreasing Marginal Utility?
According to the law of diminishing marginal utility, consumption grows at the same time that the marginal utility from each new unit decreases. The incremental gain in utility caused by consuming one more unit is called the marginal utility. The word "utility" is used in economics to denote happiness or contentment.
Know more about the Law of Demand:
brainly.com/question/10782448
#SPJ4