The effects of European colonization on East Africa versus Central and South Africa were such that:
Southern and Central Africa:
- Slavery was done on a larger scale.
- South and Central Africans were treated harshly.
- Europeans exploited resources
East Africa:
- Trade gave them access to new food crops, textiles and metal
- Slave trade was reduced compared to other parts of Africa.
<h3>How did colonization differ in East Africa versus Central and South Africa?</h3>
Colonization in Eastern Africa was not as bad as in the Central and Southern parts as colonization brought trade which brought new crops and metal products. The slave trade was also not as much as other parts of Africa.
Central and Southern Africa on the other hand, faced a lot of slavery from the Portuguese in Angola and the Belgians in the Congo. This led to the impoverishment of Africans while their wealth was exploited heavily and in places like South Africa, this continued well into the 20th century.
Find out more on colonization in Africa at brainly.com/question/12360924.
#SPJ1
<span>The Catholic church was the force in colonizing the southwestern part of america when it was colonized by the Spanish north of the Rio Grande river. Missionaries spread the gospel among the indians and presidios were built at this time to further the colonization.</span>
Answer:
D- The Fusion vandalized businesses that supported the Bourbons and used intimidation against public speakers supporting them.
Explanation:
Answer:
C. Democratic-Republicans supported France, while Federalists feared events in France.
Explanation:
The Civilization got it start in China at ~~ The Yellow and Yangtze River Valleys.