Which Emperor are you talking about?
Answer:
Explanation:
I stepped into the time machine and took myself back to January 14th, 2017. the day messed everything up. I had made a huge mistake that day I had chosen to not join the track team. because of this I lost that friend because she met a bunch of new ppl in track. and she had more instead of me. once I was back on the 14th I walked over to my friend and said I would join with her, we walked to the office and filled out the forms together. I stepped back into the time machine and came back to present time, I call her up and she asks if we wanna go on a run to start preparing for track season.
Capitalize "Y" in you since it is the start of a statement
Answer:
Summary Of Rethinking The Wild By Christopher Solomon Essay
1530 Words7 Pages
Humanity co-exists with nature in a relationship that periodically shifts between symbiotic and parasitic. We maintain this relationship in order to survive. In exchange, we carefully monitor how our behavior alters the natural environment and affects those living within it. This responsibility is the price we pay for our species’ sentience and dominance. To help fulfill our duty, America established the 1954 Wilderness Act in hopes of becoming passive “guardians” of nature instead of encroaching “gardeners.” However, the Wilderness Act has failed. In his article, “Rethinking the Wild”, Christopher Solomon questions the effectiveness of the law and correctly concludes that, after fifty years of dormancy, mankind must take an active role in environmental protection, the role of the gardener. Though critics may argue that the passivity of the “guardian” should be maintained, realistically, little can be done to preserve the environment when we refuse to do anything. Because mankind has a greater stake in the wilderness than we realize, we must assume a proactive role in protecting the wilderness out of respect for nature and our own ethical standards.
Boundaries and Investments
Assume for the sake of our argument that nature holds no intrinsic value. Why, then, is the wilderness worth protecting? Truthfully, the wilderness can be a valuable indicator of the planet’s overall health, which is not easily gauged in industrialized and populated areas due to human influence.
I think that the way that our parents or grandparents personality can relate to characters in the classic texts
