Answer:
A residential property is greatly diminished in value because of the constant noise of jets taking off from a recently expanded municipal airport. In order to be compensated for this loss, the owner could:
B.bring a suit alleging inverse condemnation
Explanation:
A law suit is a claim or legal problem taken to a court of law by an individual or organization rather than the authorities for a legal decision to be made. In the case above, the residential property diminished in value after constant noise of jets taking off from a recently expanded municipal airport. The loss in value is as a result of the recently expanded municipal airport and the property owner wants to be compensated for this loss.
In law, there are different terminologies and phrases that have specific meaning, some of them are as follows;
1. Inverse condemnation
Inverse condemnation is a case where a government entity takes private property or influences the value of that private property in one way or another then fails to compensate. In our case, this law suit can apply since the municipal airport is under the jurisdiction of the government and there action of expanding the airport caused a decline in value of neighboring residential property thus they should compensate the owner for this loss. The owner can bring a suit alleging inverse compensation.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option D: Both the foreseeable doctrine and the restatement doctrine.
Explanation:
On the one hand, the <em>foreseeable doctrine</em> dictates that there is a limit in the liability of party for those acts that he has done and that carry a risk of foreseeable harm. Therefore that this point of view establishes that a reasonable person would be able to understand and so to know when a certain action would bring certain damages to another party.
On the oher hand, the <em>restatement doctrine</em> establishes that there are a set of treatises on legal subjects that primarily are looking for to inform judges and lawyers about general principles of common law. And therefore that those treatises will help both the judge and the lawyers at the time of the trial when the person has to go to court.
well if im right it should be 20$.
Due to the greatest cost of goods sold, the LIFO (Last In Last Out) technique displays the lowest net profitability. Compared to the other techniques of inventory valuation, the cost of goods sold for the LIFO approach is the greatest.
<h3>Which technique of inventory valuation will result in the lowest net profit?</h3>
The application of LIFO will produce the lowest net income and the greatest estimated cost of goods sold among the three options during periods of inflation.
<h3>Which method of inventory has the lowest income tax rate?</h3>
LIFO is the inventory cost flow method that yields the lowest income tax liability. A form of inventory cost flow mechanism called last-in-first-out (LIFO) operates under the presumption that the last item acquired will be the first item to be sold.
<h3>In an era of inflation, which inventory method results in the lowest income tax?</h3>
Due to increasing COGS, LIFO leads to reduced net income (and taxes). However, under LIFO during inflation, there are fewer inventory write-downs. Results from average cost are in the middle of FIFO and LIFO.
To Know more about techniques
brainly.com/question/13655064
#SPJ4
Janice's choice is an example of fiscal responsibility. Fiscal responsibility is characterized as utilizing the assets of the patient to amplify medical advantages while at the same time using the assets of the organization to boost cost-adequacy. Being monetarily dependable means settling on capable asset portion choices.
