The future amount in the account (Roth IRA) is equal to: D. $180,488. 86.
<u>Given the following data:</u>
To determine the future amount in the account:
Mathematically, the compound interest for this Roth IRA is given by the formula:
![A = \frac{P(1\;+\;r)^t -1}{r}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7BP%281%5C%3B%2B%5C%3Br%29%5Et%20-1%7D%7Br%7D)
<u>Where:</u>
- t is the number of years.
Substituting the given parameters into the formula, we have;
![A = \frac{4291(1\;+\;0.0223)^{30} -1}{0.0223}\\\\A = \frac{4291(1.0223)^{30} -1}{0.0223}\\\\A = \frac{4291(1.93798684094 -1}{0.0223}\\\\A = \frac{4291(0.93798684094)}{0.0223}\\\\A = \frac{4024.901534474}{0.0223}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B4291%281%5C%3B%2B%5C%3B0.0223%29%5E%7B30%7D%20-1%7D%7B0.0223%7D%5C%5C%5C%5CA%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B4291%281.0223%29%5E%7B30%7D%20-1%7D%7B0.0223%7D%5C%5C%5C%5CA%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B4291%281.93798684094%20-1%7D%7B0.0223%7D%5C%5C%5C%5CA%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B4291%280.93798684094%29%7D%7B0.0223%7D%5C%5C%5C%5CA%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B4024.901534474%7D%7B0.0223%7D)
A = $180,488.86
Read more on compound interest here: brainly.com/question/25263325
Answer:
In employment law, a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) (US) or bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR) (Canada) or genuine occupational qualification (GOQ) (UK) is a quality or an attribute that employers are allowed to consider when making decisions on the hiring and retention of employees—a quality that when considered in other contexts would constitute discrimination and thus be in violation of civil rights employment law. Such qualifications must be listed in the employment offering.[citation needed]
Explanation:
Canada
The law of Canada regarding bona fide occupational requirements was considered in a 1985 Canadian court case involving an employee of the Canadian National Railway, K. S. Bhinder, a Sikh whose religion required that he wear a turban, lost his challenge of the CNR policy that required him to wear a hard hat.[1] In 1990, in deciding another case, the Supreme Court of Canada amended the Bhinder decision: "An employer that has not adopted a policy with respect to accommodation and cannot otherwise satisfy the trier of fact that individual accommodation would result in undue hardship will be required to justify his conduct with respect to the individual complainant. Even then the employer can invoke the BFOQ defence."[2]
United States
In employment discrimination law in the United States, both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act contain a BFOQ defense. The BFOQ provision of Title VII provides that:
[I]t shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to hire and employ employees, for an employment agency to classify, or refer for employment any individual, for a labor organization to classify its membership or to classify or refer for employment any individual, or for an employer, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining programs to admit or employ any individual in any such program, on the basis of his religion, sex, or national origin in those certain instances where religion, sex, or national origin is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise ...[3]
i'm not able to add the balance of the answer so pls go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bona_fide_occupational_qualification
Answer:
return on assets = 20%
Explanation:
given data
net income = $900
beginning total assets = $4600
ending total assets = $4400
solution
we get here return on assets that is express as
return on assets =
× 100 ............1
here average assets will be
average assets = ![\frac{4600+4400}{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B4600%2B4400%7D%7B2%7D)
average assets = $4500
put here value we get
return on assets =
× 100
return on assets = 20%
Answer:
Explanation: hey, do your best i think you can do good
Answer:
Exxon's response worsened its public standing.
Explanation:
Crisis management is the application of game plan to help an organization deal with a sudden and significant negative event.
The Exxon's response is a perfect example of how company should apply thoughtful response in crisis management because Exxon corporation failed to follow several well-established procedures thereby damaged its public standing, failed to seize control of developments after the spill and sending lower-ranking executive to address the situation instead of the chairman going there himself to take control of the situation in a possible way.
The action taken by Exxon led to the impression that the company disregard pollution problem by not involving top management.