Answer:
here's a link to a shmoop article that has a synopsis of chapter 5
Explanation:
https://www.shmoop.com/study-guides/literature/seedfolks/summary/chapter-5#:~:text=Leona,doctors%20were%20off%20their%20rockers.
The answer are C and D.
Whenever we <em>noticed a mistake</em> in an article published, but we are <em>not</em> completely <em>sure</em> what exactly is, we <em>should research</em> about the subject, in this case, by reading various <em>historical accounts</em>. After making sure we know what facts were left out, the <em>next step is to inform the edito</em>r of the publicaton about the case.
I believe the answer is A
Answer: It is specific.
Explanation:
The evidence provided in the excerpt make the author's argument more effective because it is specific.
The author was specific about the importance of switching to renewable energy. He outlined that it can lead to job creation and he was specific and gave examples about how it can create many jobs in the United States.
Helen Keller woman was an amazing woman. Though she was a person with large setbacks in her life, she never let that stop her form becoming a memorable woman.
She worked hard and concentrated on her work. She was actually the first blind-deaf woman to get a degree in arts. She should be an inspiration to all, whether big or small, successful or not.
She is a role model for success. With a drive that is hard to find.
Helen Keller, when she was young had a teacher that helped her. As years went by, she felt it to be her duty to work hard and accomplish many things.
I really hope this helps and was wondering if anybody else answers this, could I get Brainliest? Thanks and good luck! :)
