Answer:
Adam Smith-wrote The Wealth of Nations-tried to understand the laws of economics using Newton’s laws of motion
Voltaire-wrote the Treatise on Toleration-believed in absolute freedom of speech-strong advocate of religious tolerance and freedom
Explanation:
Adam Smith in the book Wealth of Nations explains what free trade makes some countries richer than the others. He discusses money's origins, and how capital makes business simpler. When explaining the idea of 'unseen hand,' he implies that the purchasing and evaluation system interacts positively and negatively with regulatory agencies where certain market consulting experts.
The best democracy, as per Voltaire, is a parliamentary democracy because it provides justice, a level of normalcy and limited monarch powers as governed by a charter. He has promoted an individualist-based democracy where people should be treated equally.
For his own sake, no. What he did blatantly put himself in danger and finally was placed under interrogation, etc & so forth.
For the sake of science, yes. What he did, and the consequences thereof, would have publicised his struggle, especially during the age of Enlightenment. Although what he did might also have momentarily pushed people away from science in fear of the consequences of facing the church due to the harsh punishment that he was subjected to. His persistence was, in the end only healthy for the development of science in later years.
To deliver a letter to Japan telling them to sign a treaty.
<span>Justinian sponsored reconstruction of the site where Moses spoke with God. The monastery was and remains a popular pilgrimage destination. Monks live in poverty, celibacy, and meditation within the monastery. The reconstruction included an Apse mosaic that captures the stories of Moses.</span>
Answer:
1. to give the legislature the power to pass new laws
2. to discourage racial mixing
3. to retain public support
Explanation:
The Pearsall Plan, which was a response of the North Carolina to the ruling of the United States Supreme Court on the unconstitutionality of racial segregation in public schools.
Created in 1956, Pearsall Plan sought a moderate approach to mix their public schools, however, in the bid to achieve their goal, the plan gave reason the state (North Carolina) should amend her Constitution, to reach common ground on the issue. The following are the reasons given:
1. to give the legislature the power to pass new laws: this enable the legislature to passed legislation that delay the integration.
2. to discourage racial mixing: there is also amendment of Compulsory School Attendance Law which excused students from going to integrated schools, there by discouraging racial mixing in public schools.
3. to retain public support of school: the plan seek to give more power to the school board which in turn, helps to retain public school supports.
Thereafter, in the case of Godwin v. Johnston County Board of Education (1969), ruled the Pearsall Plan unconstitutional.
