Answer:
king odoacer
he deposed the last emperor of the romance empire in italy
Answer:
<h2>North</h2><h3> Strength </h3>
- The North had an enormous industrial advantage
- the North manufactured 97 percent of the country's firearms
Weakness
- . They did not know the land the other side were fighting on the defensive in its own territory and were familiar with the landscape
<h2>
South</h2>
Weakness
- At the beginning of the war, the Confederacy had only one-ninth the industrial capacity of the Union.
- There was not even one rifle works in the entire South
<h3> Strength</h3>
- The South could produce all the food it needed
- The South also had a great nucleus of TRAINED OFFICERS. Seven of the eight military colleges in the country were in the South.
Patronage ( which held a very similar meaning to favouritism) ,
will make our society controlled by those who are not genuinely care for others and very unsuitable to be in charge. Because of this, the government policies that made usually tend to benefit only small number of upperclass people
hope this helps
Answer: Appointing judges to the court.
Explanation: Firstly, enforcing a law doesn’t really limit the power of the judicial branch because they can simply strike down the law if it’s unconstitutional. Secondly, the President does not have the power to approve judicial nominations. That is only the Senate’s job. The President can appoint or nominate them, but the Senate is the one who approves.
Also, vetoing laws doesn’t limit the Judicial Branch’s power really in any way. Now, the correct answer is: Appointing judges / justices to the courts. This is because this power can not be limited at all by the judicial branch, only by congress. The Senate can deny the confirmation / appointment of a President’s appointee, and the Congress can also impeach that appointee later on for committed high crimes. The Judicial Branch can’t do any of that. The President can limit the Judiciary’s power by appointing judges that will go against any potential agenda of the Judicial Branch. For instance, if there happens to be liberal Supreme Court, whereas a majority of the members of the Supreme Court identify as liberal or were appointed by a Democratic President, a Republican President may want to nominate / appoint a conservative Justice or Justices to cancel out their majority and re-take the majority of the court. Honestly, this was a poorly worded question (not your fault at all, but the person who wrote it) because this doesn’t limit the power of the Judicial Branch in terms of its constitutional structure and powers, it merely limits and restricts the narrative or agenda of the members of the branch. Anyway, your answer is B: Appointing judges to the court.
