Answer:
c. $60,000
Explanation:
Provided information,
Green Corp owns 30% of the the common stock and 100% of preference share capital of Axel Corp.
Also, Green Corp is exercising significant influence on Axel Corp.
Thus, for accounting purpose Green Corp will use equity method as the investment is more than 20%.
Any dividend received from Axel Corp on common stock will be deducted from carrying value of investment in common stock, though dividend received on preference capital will increase the profits as will be added to income statement.
Thus, dividend recognized in Income Statement = $60,000 received on preference capital.
Correct answer is
c. $60,000
Answer:
Increase; fall
Explanation:
Due to the slightly above normal rainfall levels which led to a large black morel harvest, <em>the supply of the commodity will increase</em>.
However, since demand for the commodity is expected to remain the same as it was in 2007 despite the increase in supply, <em>the equilibrium price is expected to fall</em> as supply exceeds demand.
The flow of money received on a sometimes a weekly, monthly, or yearly basis is known as SALARY.
Salary is the compensation employees received from their employers. It can be weekly, monthly, or yearly basis depending on the contract agreement between the two parties.
Answer:
Social media is a very good way of protesting because many many people go on social media sites and they can join in and instead of being abused by other people outside you can easily make a protest on video or a website.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Proposed bargain or deal is supportive of the business visionaries instead of the financial backer(investor) since all the capital is coming from the financial backer and the investor will be receiving just only 25% for the bargain or deal while he faces all the challenges posed or loss of capital. The business visionaries are not placing in any of their own personal capital but only their idea. They likewise have a bigger say in the administration of the business and the financial backer has no power over the choice since he conveys just 25% votes. Consequently, it's not a good bargain or deal for the financial backer considering the risk-reward ratio.
The counter-offer will include raising a proposed equity percent rate to half (i.e 50%). In addition to that, the financial backer needs to demand another seat on the board with the goal that they have equivalent authority over the administration and its choices. The most reduced the financial backer can go down is equity of 40% stake.
