In Behavioral <span>terms, prejudice is connected with avoidance and aggression.</span>
Malcolm in this situation who is described as a person who believes that happiness and fulfillment can be achieved through the acquisition of material possessions is termed as materialist.
People who buy material things are called materialists. They are described as persons who value materialistic activities and choose to purchase tangible stuff above experiences in studies.
People who are materialists by nature are more focused on worldly values than they are on spiritual, intellectual, or cultural ones. According to philosophy, materialism and physicalism—the idea that everything on earth is fundamentally physical—are intimately related.
Pertaining to the notion that a person just lives in a preoccupation with the material world, as opposed to ideas that are intellectual or spiritual or the assumption that physical substance is the only thing that exists.
Learn more about Malcolm:
brainly.com/question/14319207
#SPJ4
The complete question is ''When malcolm gets upset, he shops. though it never delivers on the promise fully, he can’t stop believing that new possessions will give him a new outlook on the upsetting situation. malcolm’s belief that happiness and fulfillment can be achieved through the acquisition of material possessions is known as:?
Answer:
Option A: Appeal to unqualified authority
Explanation:
Fallacies of Weak Induction
This is said to take place only occurs the premises used as provided to support for a conclusion, but it is not enough to believe the conclusion.
Types of Fallacies of Weak Induction
1. Appeal to Unqualified Authority, 2. Appeal to Ignorance
3. Hasty Generalization
4. False Cause
5. Slippery Slope
6. Weak Analogy
Appeal to Unqualified Authority
In this type of appeal, an arguer used a statement made by another person as a form of evidence for a conclusion, and usually, that person is not qualified to to make such a statement. It is also defined as when the arguer appeals to an inappropriate or unqualified authority or expert as the basis for accepting a conclusion, therefore the viewpoint of such an individual that is raised is said to be logically irrelevant. It is only when an appeal to a legitimate expert such as eye-witness in court case etc. then it is a type of inductive argument.
Answer:
20
Explanation:
hope this works good luck!!!