Answer:
x=7.2 y=7.5 this is the answer
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:



1) Substituting into point-slope form, the equation of the line is y-6=⅓(x-3), which rearranges to:
So, we can now substitute in the coordinates of each of the options to see which point lies on the line.
- 3 = ⅓(6) + 5 -> 3 = 7, which is false.
- 6 = ⅓(7) + 5 -> 6 = 22/3, which is false.
- -3 = ⅓(-3) + 5 -> -3 = 4, which is false.
- 3 = ⅓(-6) + 5 -> 3 = 3, which is true.
So, the answer is (4) (-6, 3)
2) Substituting into point-slope form, the equation of the line is y - 5 = ¾(x-2), which rearranges to:
- y - 5 = 0.75x - 1.5
- y = 0.75x + 3.5
So, we can now substitute in the coordinates of each of the options to see which point lies on the line.
- 8 = 0.75(6)+3.5 -> 8 = 8, which is true.
- 9 = 0.75(5) + 3.5 -> 9 = 7.25, which is false.
- 1 = 0.75(-1) + 3.5 -> 1 = 2.75, which is false.
- 2 = 0.75(6) + 3.5 -> 2 = 8, which is false.
So, the answer is (1) (6, 8).
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Because we are told equivalent expressions for y and z we can plug those in to 2(y+z).

Then simplify by combining like terms of the expressions. Values ending in x^2 can be combined with each other.

Now we can distribute the 2 by multiplying each value in the parentheses by 2.

Answer:
Option A is right
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that approximately 52% of all recent births were boys. In a simple random sample of 100 recent births, 49 were boys and 51 were girls. The most likely explanation for the difference between the observed results and the expected results in this case is
A) variability due to sampling
-- True because there is a slight difference whichmay be due to sampling fluctuations.
B) bias
False because given that 100 random births selected
C) nonsampling error
False. There is no chance for systematic error here.
d) Confounding: There is no confounding variable present inchild birth since each is independent of the other
e) a sampling frame that is incomplete
False because the sampling is done correctly.