Answer:
The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).
Explanation:
I also got this out of google
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
Wodiczko’s video installations commented on the social
injustice. This was one of the main themes in the works of this celebrated
Polish artist who was known for the practice he called Interrogative design. With his Interrogative design which combines technology
with art he wanted to raise awareness of the social problems that plagued
the people across the world.
Answer:
A: Government regulation protects constitutional rights, safety, and fairness.
Explanation:
What? What’s your question?
