Answer: $1,852,320
Explanation:
First find out the proportion owned by Matsui.
= 74,800 shares / 220,000
= 34%
The investment at the end of the year is:
= Cost of investment + Shares of net income - Share of dividend
Share of income:
= Percentage ownership * Net income
= 34% * 240,000
= $81,600
Share of dividend:
= 34% * 72,000
= $24,480
Investment at end of year:
= 1,795,200 + 81,600 - 24,480
= $1,852,320
Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: give too much weight to a small number of vivid observations.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the case that a close friend had told you that he had a bad experience in a certain place, a restaurant in particular this time, does not states the fact that it will always be like that for every person that goes to that place because it may have been a bad day for the employees and that impacts at their work while if you go any other day every detail is taking care nicely. Therefore that the people give too much weight to small number of vivid observations due to the fact that the article published in the newspaper must have been made with over dozens of observations and comments, not just one, and the major agreement is that those places are good ones to go to eat.
Answer:
<u>c. there is the possibility that the funds are used for riskier behavior than the lender agreed to.</u>
Explanation:
True. The term "Moral Hazard" as used in an investment context, often refers to a scenario where one party with a <em>lesser risk burden</em> in a business agreement, <u>deliberately </u>takes investment risk that would be detrimental to others in the agreement who have a higher risk burden.
It is an unethical business practice; a moral hazard, and so acts as a barrier to investors who may want to finance global growth.
I think it's B, to prevent unfair or deceptive business practices. I'm might be wrong though, so you may wanna just check with someone else. Hope this helps
Answer:
Direct labor rate variance= (Standard Rate - Actual Rate)*Actual hours
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The production used 2.5 labor hours per finished unit, and the company paid $21 per hour, totaling $52.50 per unit of finished product.
<u>We weren't provided with enough information to solve the problem. We need estimated production hours and rates. But, I can leave the formula to solve it.</u>
To calculate direct labor rate variance, we need to use the following formula:
Direct labor rate variance= (Standard Rate - Actual Rate)*Actual Hours
