Answer:
4.20 and normal good
Explanation:
The computation of the income elasticity of demand is shown below:
= (change in quantity demanded ÷ average of quantity demanded) ÷ (percentage change in income ÷ average of quantity income)
where,
Change in income would be
= Q2 - Q1
= 109,500 - 102,300
= 7,200
And, average of income would be
= (109,500 + 102,300) ÷ 2
= 105,900
Change in quantity demanded would be
= 4 - 3
= 1
And, average of quantity demanded would be
= ($4 + 3) ÷ 2
= 3.5
So, after solving this, the income elasticity of demand is 4.20
Since the elasticity comes in positive which means the good is a normal goods
Answer:
The answer is:
a. 17.2
b. 7.53%
c. Baker's performance is 0.47% lower than the industry performance
Explanation:
a. Baker's Inventory turnover = cost of sales/inventory
$21,500/$ 1,250
=17.2
b. Baker's Percentage of assets committed to inventory = (inventory/assets) x 100
($1,250/$16,600) x 100
7.53%
c. The industry's Percentage of assets committed to inventory is 8% whereas Baker's own 7.53%, meaning Baker's performance is 0.47% lower than the industry performance
Answer:
A. whistle-blowing.
Explanation:
Whistle-blowing occurs when an employee exposes information of wrong-doing, unethical practice, or illegal actions. The information released can either be to internal authorities or it can be released to external parties.
When an employee does not have confidence that appropriate action will be taken on the information provided, employees tend to go to external parties with the information.
This was the case with EAC above where the staff were going to the press. EAC now set up a whistle-blowing framework that increased employee confidence and reduced turn-over.
When the boss hears about this, the employee would probably go under training or in the worst scenario can be fired. A serious company that wanted to be on top most likely wanted individuals who are willing to take different tasks and understand how the business works. The employee should learn about the business and improve.