Answer:
- Talking about the conversation with a compliance officer of his firm
- Accept unsolicited trades from costumers in the company's stock
Explanation:
The agent listened to another company's employee talking on the phone about confidential information, that is, private information that the agent should not be listening to, but he has heard and can use it to his company's advantage. Since no one knows that the agent has this information, he can talk about the conversation he has heard with a compliance officer at his company, and he can accept unsolicited dealings from customers on the company's stock.
Answer:
Option 2 is the right answer
Explanation:
When government obtains any evidence though a conduct deemed unconstitutional (unlawful search or seizure), such evidence would be suppressed by the court. When the defendant is brought to court for eventual trial, such evidence would be inadmissible. U.S courts have used this rule in several occasions, to prevent police officers and agents of the government from abusing constitutional rights of the people.
King John demanded soldiers or money from his barons in order to carry on a war in France over disputed lands. Many of the barons believed that the dispute between John and the French king was none of their business. So, they refused to send King John knights or pay what amounted to a special tax.
BRAINLIEST PLEASE
Answer:
In the case of Parsons v. State, 1887, the Irresistible Impulse Test was first introduced.
Explanation:
The Court of Alabama stated that, although it would have been possible that the defendant had right from wrong, that he had "dismissed the power of choice between right and wrong" and that, "at a time when his free organization was destroyed," and that therefore, the alleged crime was so closely related, in relation to cause and effect, to such a mental disease that it has been the result of.
I hope this was understood very well, and as always, I am joyous to assist anyone at any time. ☺️
