If the police had no warrant saying they could go in or search Joe's house then the police could be in a certain amount of trouble as well seeing as Joe did not willingly let them in and they never had a warrant but Joe could be in a lot more trouble for being in the possession of drugs.
And smart homes should be more advanced to these kinds of things because they could have been fake cops, plus they had no warrant which leaves everyone in this situation at fault especially Joe for being in the possession of drugs and the possible false 911 call influenced on drugs either making him see things or think things, maybe even both.
Answer:
The amount of the distributive share of partnership net income that is taxable by California is the share of the partnership's net income of $10,000 that can be attributed to Ewan.
Assuming he holds a 50% interest in the partnership, he is expected to pay tax on his share of the $10,000 (which is equal to $5,000) in California, where the income is earned and not where he resides.
Explanation:
A partnership as an entity does not pay taxes. But individual partners must pay taxes on their shares of the partnership income, whether it is actually distributed or not. The partnership usually lists the partners' income on Schedule K-1, while individual partners fill the normal individual tax returns.
Because we Americans don't want the government to come along and make some random law about taking our self defense away from us.
The Scott test is a preliminary colorimetric method to analyze cocaine. A blue color result in the final step denotes a positive indication for cocaine; however, some pharmacological products may lead to false positives when concentration is higher than 1 mg
