Answer:
Explanation:
Drug trafficking offenses are prosecuted under the federal Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), which sets out only maximum penalties for the various offenses.
The New South Wales sentencing legislation provides for standard non-parole periods for certain state-level drug offenses, including supplying a commercial quantity of a prohibited drug, for which the period is either ten years or fifteen years depending on the amount.
Answer:
Trey owns 250 shares of common stock in a toy-store company. This means that he owns a percentage of the company based on the proportion of shares he owns out of the total shares issued by the company. With this ownership he also acquires rights to: vote. George owns 300 shares of preferred stock in a company.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Origination Clause stemmed from a British parliamentary practice that all money bills must have their first reading and any other initial readings in the House of Commons before they are sent to the House of Lords.
Explanation:
Examples of ethical behaviors in the workplace includes; obeying the company's rules, effective communication, taking responsibility, accountability, professionalism, trust and mutual respect for your colleagues at work. Examples of morals: Always tell the truth.
Do not destroy property.
Have courage.
Keep your promises.
Do not cheat.
Treat others as you want to be treated.
Do not judge.
Be dependable.
<h2><em>Explanation:</em></h2><h2><em>Explanation:A stop-and-frisk refers to a brief non-intrusive police stop of a suspect. The Fourth Amendment requires that before stopping the suspect, the police must have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed by the suspect. If the police reasonably suspect that the suspect is armed and dangerous, the police may frisk the suspect, meaning that the police will give a quick pat-down of the suspect's outer clothing. The frisk is also called a Terry Stop, derived from the Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). Terry held that a stop-and-frisk must comply with the Fourth Amendment, meaning that the stop-and-frisk cannot be unreasonable. According to the Terry court, a reasonable stop-and-frisk is one "in which a reasonably prudent officer is warranted in the circumstances of a given case in believing that his safety or that of others is endangered, he may make a reasonable search for weapons of the person believed by him to be armed and dangerous." Stop-and-frisks fall under criminal law, as opposed to civil law.</em></h2><h2 />
