1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Harman [31]
3 years ago
9

Kamran and his two sisters could not go to school. All of them helped their parents on the farm and did not have enough money to

attend school. This situation changed when
Complete the story

Moral: everyone should be treated equally
English
1 answer:
zheka24 [161]3 years ago
7 0

Kamran and his two sisters could not go to school. All of them helped their parents on the farm and did not have enough money to attend school. This situation changed when  the local government established a public basic education system for low-income families in the city. First, Kamran's parents allow only the girls' younger brother to attend school, but Kamran's mother intervened after much thought. She said the girls should also go to school, because that would give them the opportunity to change their lives and not go through the economic difficulties that she and the girls' father are going through.

It was then decided that all the brothers would have the opportunity to go to school, as they would all be treated equally. Esssa was a very beneficial decision for Kamran's parents, because in the future all the girls got good jobs, as did their brother. They had an economically healthy life and were able to help their parents with everything they needed.

You might be interested in
Please help me out here
givi [52]

Answer:

1: Yes should be captilzed

2:captail should not be

3:Captin should be

4 and the last 1 yes

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Underline the correct word in the brackets.
Usimov [2.4K]

Answer:

LOL

Explanation:

1. All the mice (are) dead.

2. Athletics (is) his main interest.

3. The jury (was) divided in their opinions. 4. All the rice in this bag (is) of good quality.

5. Much of the (work) in our school (is) very easy.

6. One of the other of those fellows (have) stolen the ring.

7. His knowledge of many languages (was) really remarkable.

8. He is one of the greatest (leaders) that (has) ever lived.

9. Mr Dev, Mrs Sharma and Miss Mary (were) present at the meeting

10. Each (soldier) (was) present at (their) post.

11. Few (men) (are) able to do (their) own cooking.

12. Either of these girls (are) allowed to write (their) name.

13. Neither of these boys (were) present then.

14. Several of these boys (were) not able to do this sum.

15. One of these (men) (come) here daily.

16. I have (many) (books) in this box, but no one of them (are) interesting. 17. We have enough (eggs) here, but (are) there enough plates?

18. Everybody in the senior classes of all schools in all countries (has) to learn more than one (languages).

19. There (were) not many people present, but everyone (was) carrying a sword.

20. Every one of these things (belongs) to me.

6 0
3 years ago
What is the claim, the opposing claim, and the counterclaim? Out of these 4 passages
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

<u>Claim:</u> the voting age should be lowered to 16 years old.

<u>Opposing claim:</u> some people are against it because they believe that 16 years olds can not make informed decisions and are going to vote according to whim or how their parents tell them to vote.

<u>Counterclaim:</u> lowering the voting age is more likely to produce a better-informed body of voters since school can help them with courses for such thing.

Explanation:

The claim in this text is that the voting age should be lowered since young people deserve to have a say in the direction of the country. Some of the reasons supporting this claim are that 16-year-olds are mature enough for this decision in contrast with teenagers of previous generations as shown in studies. Also, they are more informed and competent than adults.

The opposing claim states that 16 years olds are not well informed, and they will vote according to what their parents tell them to vote or without consciousness. There are no investigations in the article that support the opposing claim.

The counterclaim says that as 16-year-olds are still in school, the education system can develop instruction courses to teach them about the candidates. As they have the right to vote, students will be motivated to learn about this topic.

7 0
3 years ago
What is artistic endeavour ??​
olga_2 [115]
1 of or characteristic of art or artists.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which sentence uses the same meaning of the underlined word in the sentence below?
Gnesinka [82]

Answer:

? Where are the answer choices...?

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did Shakespeare use iambic pentamter for the dialongue of noble characters, while commoners often spoke in blank verse or pr
    6·1 answer
  • Have you ever gotten (or given) a "compliment" that really wasn't a compliment? how did you respond
    14·2 answers
  • Use this homophone pair in one sentence: attendance, attendants​
    15·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from the open boat by stephen Crane what is the meaning of the phrase catch hell
    12·1 answer
  • Based on the section "Violence in Alabama," which answer choice BEST explains why CORE had a difficult time finding bus drivers
    8·1 answer
  • Is the Pillow Method ever inappropriate? Aren't there some types of behavior that can't be considered "right" in any respects?
    7·2 answers
  • Read the following description of a play:
    14·1 answer
  • HURRY HELP PLEASE
    8·1 answer
  • 3. Which paragraph develops the author's claim that people affected by rising sea levels have tough choices to
    8·1 answer
  • Identify the part of speech of the italicized word in the following sentence:
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!