The answer is going to be B. Ross Perot. Perot was the candidate in 1992 who led one of the most successful independent campaigns.
I hope this answer helped! :)
Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
Because they were started by individuals outside of the law enforcement sector, the majority of early reform initiatives failed. The necessity to prevent mob violence, which was prevalent during the 19th century, led to the establishment of the first police forces in the United States. The FBI performs judicial security as one of its duties.
<h3>How did policing change throughout the reform era?</h3>
The Reform Era of policing, which lasted from 1930 to 1980, was prompted by demands for reforms from advocates. By creating a nonpartisan police force and attempting to reorganize how the police functioned, reformers hoped to divorce policing from politics during the Reform Era. Following these changes, law enforcement became more unbiased.
To know more about Reform Era of policing, visit: brainly.com/question/17357656
#SPJ4
The basis of the founder's concerns over the formation of political parties is that the political factions would tear the nation apart.
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
The designer of the Constitution believed that the Political Parties are a necessary evil and they can't avoid it. The Political factions may lead to the Civil War between the groups, so it was essential to design the Constitution keeping that in mind so that the evil effect of the Political Parties don’t spread.
The Constitutional framers were highly concerned about the formation of political parties which drifted England in civil wars of 
century. These political parties are considered as the corruption of monarchical British System in favor of democratic government.
Answer:
yes, it is.
Explanation:
War is inevitable due to the fact that history of humanity is filled with wars and these wars continue even in modern times.
