Answer:
he World Health Organization (WHO) defines noise above 65 decibels (dB) as noise pollution. To be precise, noise becomes harmful when it exceeds 75 decibels (dB) and is painful above 120 db.
Explanation:
1) It was quite necessary not only for Buck, but also for others struggling to survive in the wild North. If he hadn't killed Spitz it it could have been very dangerous for others because he was very aggressive due to the hunger. Even though he was the leader, blinded by hunger he could do anything to survive, forgetting about the rest of dogs.
2) If he hadn't died he could have get many other innocent lives, like he had done to Curley. This character yielded to the external conflict of the harsh wild conditions, and his instings were much more powerful than his sense of justice so he could have bring harm until he reached his own safety.
Is important to tell the community member about the disability do you have people have a better understanding of each other
Prior restraint, a kind of censorship, allows the government to review the content of printed materials and restrict their distribution.
- Most scholars believe that the First Amendment's guarantee of press freedom includes a prohibition on earlier restraints. The government may put restrictions on speech that make it harder for it to occur or outright prohibit public circulation of media. Prior constraint might be anything as innocent-seeming as a local rule limiting where newspapers can be sold.
- Prior constraint, also known as prior censorship or pre-publication censorship, is restriction of expression that forbids specific forms of expression and is typically applied by a government or organisation.
Thus this is the meaning of prior restraint.
Refer here to learn more about prior restraint: brainly.com/question/1143665
#SPJ4
Answer:
We can’t know the perfect time to assess every student’s level of proficiency. This isn’t a problem, however, because we use that feedback from the initial assessment, reteach or assist the student, and allow him or her to try again. We’re out for students’ success, not just to document their deficiencies.
The ineffective and unethical response, however, would be to get in the way as the child strives to learn and demonstrate understanding to the fullest extent. The teacher who denies students the option to redo tasks and assessments in order to reach a standard of excellence has to reconsider his/her role: Is the teacher in the classroom to teach so that students learn, or is he or she there to present curriculum, then hold an assessment “limbo” yardstick and see who in the class can bend flexibly and fit within its narrow parameters.
Explanation: