Answer:
C. less than 1
Explanation:
Supply is elastic if producers can increase output without a rise in cost or a time delay which means Price elasticity of supply is more than 1.
Supply is inelastic if producers find it hard to change production in a given time period which means Price elasticity of supply is less than 1.
When Price elasticity of supply equals 0 then supply is perfectly inelastic.
Answer: (D) Form Utility
Explanation:
The form utility is one of the type of concept that helps in increasing the actual value of the products in the market and in the form utility following example are the type of finished product that the customers are willing to purchase are as follows:
- Electronics products
- Furniture type goods
- Parts of vehicle
According to the given question, the given situation is helps in demonstrating that the electronic commerce plays an important contribution to the consumers value by the creating of the form utility.
Therefore, Option (D) is correct answer.
Answer:
For both 10,000 units and 20,000 units, the best alternative is Vendor B
Explanation:
Using the information provided in the question, we can write the following:
Annual Volume of 10,000 units
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 170,000 (we multiply the variable cost per unit by total units)
Fixed costs = 20,000
Total costs = 370,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 140,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 380,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 200,000 (we simply multiply the price by the quantity)
Vendor B
Total cost = 180,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 190,000
The cheapest option is Vendor B
Now for the 20,000 units:
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 340,000
Fixed costs = 200,000
Total costs = 540,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 280,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 520,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 400,000
Vendor B
Total cost = 360,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 380,000
Therefore, Vendor B is once again, the cheapest alternative.
Answer:
(a) $4.08
(b) $51.03
Explanation:
Constant growth rate for earnings:
= (EPS for any year ÷ EPS for the previous year) - 1
= (8.40 ÷ 8.00) - 1
= 0.05
= 5%
(a) EPS for 2016 = EPS for 2015 × (1 + 5%)
= 9.72 × 1.05
= $10.21
Dividend for 2016 = 40% × EPS for 2016
= 40% × 10.206
= $4.08
(b) Stock Price at the beginning of 2016:
= Dividend for 2016 ÷ (Required rate of return - Constant growth rate)
= 4.0824 ÷ (0.13 - 0.05)
= $51.03
Answer:
Make since the relevant cost to make it is $58.35
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&$produce&$buy&$Differential\\$Purchase&-&-62.35&-62.35\\$Manufacturing Cost&-58.35&-&58.35\\$Allocate Cost&-11.55&-11.55&-\\$Total Cost&-69.9&-73.9&-4\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26%24produce%26%24buy%26%24Differential%5C%5C%24Purchase%26-%26-62.35%26-62.35%5C%5C%24Manufacturing%20Cost%26-58.35%26-%2658.35%5C%5C%24Allocate%20Cost%26-11.55%26-11.55%26-%5C%5C%24Total%20Cost%26-69.9%26-73.9%26-4%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
<u></u>
<u>The manufacturing cost will be:</u>
direct material 7.70
direct labor 23.70
Overhead 38.5 x 70% = 26.95
Total manufacturing cost 58.35
Allocated cost 11.55
The purchase cost is higher than our manufacturing cost of 58.35
It is better to make the unit.
The purchase option generates a differential loss for $4
