Answer: It produces inefficient economic results under certain conditions
Explanation: The above situation is known as the paradox of voting,which tries to show that the cost of voting will always be higher than the result obtained from the voting process.This is because Majority voting undermines the importance of an individual voter. This issue was first highlighted in 1793 by Nicolas de Condorcet,where noted that in a single stage election the influence of a single voter reduces as the number of voters increase.
The paradox of voting further highlights that the expected results/outcome of a voter from an electioneering process is less than what the initial expectations.
A correlational research allows researcher to discover the strength and direction of relationships that exist between two variables.
Despite that a correlational research can indicate the possibility of a cause-effect relationship, it does not prove whether an underlying third factor may can the correlation.
In conclusion, the correlational research can help make prediction because its can indicate the possibility of a cause-effect relationship but can not prove the direction of the influence.
Read more about correlational research
<em>brainly.com/question/17226891</em>
Answer:
I would say your answer is Forecloser.
Identity foreclosure is a stage of self-identity discovery in which an individual has an identity but hasn't explored other options or ideas.
(Just like she is doing because she hasn't thought for herself yet)
<u>Forecloser is when the individual has just adopted the traits and qualities of parents and friends.</u>