Answer:
a. Leslie, who is independent and self-confident. She doesn’t need people to tell her what to do.
b. Malcolm, who loves to play. His last boss says that Malcolm was the "chief kid" in his last office.
c. Frankie, who has been in the toy business for 10 years and who knows what he’s doing, but who always likes testing a new idea.
Explanation:
In this scenario the CEO of a start-up toy manufacturer wants to create at least 10 wildly different toys in the next three years.
He will primarily need people that are creative and are inclined to work with new ideas.
The wrong choice will be someone who follows the rules and is stable. Such a staff will not contribute new ideas that will move the company to make profits.
Leslie is confident and does not need to be told what to do, so she will take initiative to do new things.
Malcolm loves to play and this will boost creative ideas.
Frankie likes testing new ideas and will be comfortable working creatively.
Answer:
the net book value of the asset halfway through its useful life will be less than if straight-line depreciation is used.
Explanation:
Let me use an example to illustrate this.
An asset has a useful life of 4 years. It costs $1000. It has a salvage value of 0
If the straight line depreciation method is used , the depreciation expense every year = $1000/ 4 = $250
The net book value halfway through its useful life = $1000 - ($250 x 2) = $500
If double declining method is used, the depreciation expense in the first year would be = 2/4 x $1000 = $500
The net book value at the beginning of year 2 = $1000 - $500 = $500
Depreciation expense in year 2 = 2/4 x $500 = $250
The net book value at the beginning of year 3 = $500 - $250 = $250
We can see that the net book value halfway through the useful is lower when double declining depreciation method is used
The answer is: D - Debit Cash; credit John, Capital.
Explanation:
The entry records the investment of cash by John, owner of a sole proprietorship is: Debit Cash; credit John, Capital.
Answer:
c. Neglecting the Other Side’s Problems.
Explanation:
To be an effective negotiator one must understand what his interest is and what he can compromise and the limits to what can be given to the other party (that is no-deal options).
It is even more important to understand the other parties problem. This can be used to guage their interest and how it can be met.
Not considering the counterparty problem is a mistake the negotiating team have made. If the other partie's problem is not understood then there won't be an effective way of negotiating.
Flow to Equity (FTE) is the approach to capital budgeting that discounts the after-tax cash flow from a project going to the equity holders of a levered firm.
An alternative capital budgeting strategy is the flow to equity (FTE) or free cash flow approach. The FTE approach merely requires that equity capital be discounted at the cost of the cash flows from the project to the equity holders of the leveraged firm. The amount of cash that a company's equity shareholders have access to after all costs, reinvestment, and debt repayment is taken into account is known as flow to equity. Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE) is calculated as Net Income - (Capital Expenditures - Depreciation) - (Change in Non-cash Working Capital) - (Change in Non-cash Equity) + (New Debt Issued - Debt Repayments) This is the cash flow that can be used to repurchase stock or pay dividends.
More about cash flow brainly.com/question/17406590
#SPJ4
