Answer:
The potential of additional regional currencies such as the euro is very important, and for this reason, many economists support the idea. In fact, John Maynard Keynes, one of the most influential economists in history, once proposed not a regional common currency, but a common global currency.
The potential lies in the fact that regional currencies allow to coordinate a common monetary policy in several countries. This common policy means that several countries now have the same interest rates, the same rate of inflation, and the same currency itself, and all these commonalities facilitate the exchange of goods and services.
While the Euro has had drawbacks since its inception, the Euro has survived, and is now one of the strongest curriencies in the world.
If you support the concept, should those currencies be tied to regional economic blocs?
I support the concept, and I agree that they should be tied to regional economic bloc. It would not be very effective to adopt a common currency for countries that are not economically integrated in other areas.
Your "gross monthly income" is the amount you make BEFORE they take out any deductions.
Your "gross monthly income" is the amount you make AFTER they take out any deductions.
Answer: c. closing the sale is the final—and most satisfying—part of the process.
Explanation:
Closing the sale is NOT the final part of the process but rather the FOLLOW-UP.
And like option e in the question shows, following up can lead to more sales for the representative because following up can guage customer satisfaction and if the customer is satisfied, they could become loyal and recurrent customers.
Answer:
a. false
b. true
c. true
d. false
Explanation:
a. The first statement is false as the demand for the soft drink do not declines
b. The second statement is true as the quantity demanded decreased
c The third statement is true as the supplied decreased
d. The fouth statement is false as the quantity suppied do not decline
Therefore the option b and C are correct and option A and D are incorrect
Answer:
PPF : Downward Sloping Straight Line
Explanation:
PPF is the locus of product combinations that an economy can produce, given resources & technology.
It is downward sloping : Because of inverse relationship between two goods- if one has to be increased other has to be decreased , because of same resources & technology.
Marginal Opportunity Cost (Slope of PPC): is ratio of a good sacrifised to gain each additional unit of the other good.
∆ Good sacrifised / ∆ Good gained
If this ratio is same i.e constant amount of a good is sacrifised to gain an additional amount of the other one , the slope of PPC is constant & it is a straight line
Eg : Good1 Good2 MOC [∆Good2/∆Good1]
0 20 _
10 10 -10/10 = -1 (10-20)/(10-0)
20 0 -10/10 = -1 (0-10)(/20-10)
So , same (1) good 2 is sacrifised to attain a good 1 each time.
However Generally: MOC is increasing , because of assumption that resources are unequally efficient in various goods production - shifting good from efficient to inefficient increases sacrifise each time. This makes PPC usually concave.
