Answer:
3) the Muslim -Hindu riots and violence
Explanation:
Once it was decided that India should be granted independence everyone seemed happy and excited about it, but they were not aware that the country was going to be partitioned. India was partitioned into two nations, India and Pakistan (West and East), based on the dominant religion. The reason for the partition was to avoid conflicts between the two groups, but they occurred nonetheless immediately after the independence. Both the Hindus and the Muslims were not pleased, so they started to riot and attack each other, with the end result being a refugee crisis. Millions of people were dislocated, lost their homes and families, or lost their lives.
Answer:
b. Cuba
Explanation:
the US primarily fought in Cuba during the war, (battle of San Juan hill), the Phillipines was also a spanish possession that the U.S. gained as well
1. The correct answer is A. Forced sterilization. According to Julian Huxley, if there was a mentally defective indivilual, the principal goal of eugenics in this case was to make sure that this indivilual will not produce children, chich meant sterilization of the unit.
2. The correct answer is A. The Kennedy family. The whole Kennedy family dedicated themselves to helping people, and children in particular, with disabilities. To be more precise, the Kennedy family did their best to help and support disabled people in the fields of art and sport.
Answer:
Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare that acts of the other branches of government are unconstitutional, and thus unenforceable. For example if Congress were to pass a law banning newspapers from printing information about certain political matters, courts would have the authority to rule that this law violates the First Amendment, and is therefore unconstitutional. State courts also have the power to strike down their own state’s laws based on the state or federal constitutions.
Today, we take judicial review for granted. In fact, it is one of the main characteristics of government in the United States. On an almost daily basis, court decisions come down from around the country striking down state and federal rules as being unconstitutional. Some of the topics of these laws in recent times include same sex marriage bans, voter identification laws, gun restrictions, government surveillance programs and restrictions on abortion.
Other countries have also gotten in on the concept of judicial review. A Romanian court recently ruled that a law granting immunity to lawmakers and banning certain types of speech against public officials was unconstitutional. Greek courts have ruled that certain wage cuts for public employees are unconstitutional. The legal system of the European Union specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review is also afforded to the courts of Canada, Japan, India and other countries. Clearly, the world trend is in favor of giving courts the power to review the acts of the other branches of government.
However, it was not always so. In fact, the idea that the courts have the power to strike down laws duly passed by the legislature is not much older than is the United States. In the civil law system, judges are seen as those who apply the law, with no power to create (or destroy) legal principles. In the (British) common law system, on which American law is based, judges are seen as sources of law, capable of creating new legal principles, and also capable of rejecting legal principles that are no longer valid. However, as Britain has no Constitution, the principle that a court could strike down a law as being unconstitutional was not relevant in Britain. Moreover, even to this day, Britain has an attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy. Therefore, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down legislation.
Explanation:
nationalparalegal.edu /JudicialReview.aspx
Answer:
john 3:17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him
Explanation:
