1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
svet-max [94.6K]
3 years ago
15

10 POINTS

History
1 answer:
netineya [11]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare that acts of the other branches of government are unconstitutional, and thus unenforceable. For example if Congress were to pass a law banning newspapers from printing information about certain political matters, courts would have the authority to rule that this law violates the First Amendment, and is therefore unconstitutional. State courts also have the power to strike down their own state’s laws based on the state or federal constitutions.

Today, we take judicial review for granted. In fact, it is one of the main characteristics of government in the United States. On an almost daily basis, court decisions come down from around the country striking down state and federal rules as being unconstitutional. Some of the topics of these laws in recent times include same sex marriage bans, voter identification laws, gun restrictions, government surveillance programs and restrictions on abortion.

Other countries have also gotten in on the concept of judicial review. A Romanian court recently ruled that a law granting immunity to lawmakers and banning certain types of speech against public officials was unconstitutional. Greek courts have ruled that certain wage cuts for public employees are unconstitutional. The legal system of the European Union specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review is also afforded to the courts of Canada, Japan, India and other countries. Clearly, the world trend is in favor of giving courts the power to review the acts of the other branches of government.

However, it was not always so. In fact, the idea that the courts have the power to strike down laws duly passed by the legislature is not much older than is the United States. In the civil law system, judges are seen as those who apply the law, with no power to create (or destroy) legal principles. In the (British) common law system, on which American law is based, judges are seen as sources of law, capable of creating new legal principles, and also capable of rejecting legal principles that are no longer valid. However, as Britain has no Constitution, the principle that a court could strike down a law as being unconstitutional was not relevant in Britain. Moreover, even to this day, Britain has an attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy. Therefore, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down legislation.

Explanation:

nationalparalegal.edu /JudicialReview.aspx

You might be interested in
Support or defat that civil war was a second American revolution. back up your answer with evidence
yanalaym [24]

<u>Answer:</u>

Yes, the civil war was a second American revolution because it freed the nation from the clutches of the practice of slavery.

<u>Explanation: </u>

  • The first American Revolution secured for the colonies independence from the unjust British administration and gave them the freedom to lead lives as free men of an independent country.
  • Similarly, the civil war brought the practice of slavery to an end and extended the concession of living freely to the yet more deprived classes of humans.
  • Hence, for the fact that both the movements dispensed freedom, it can be concluded that civil war was the second American Revolution.
8 0
3 years ago
Document A
Novosadov [1.4K]

Answer:

But the foundations of modern science were laid long before this time, and were particularly influenced by Islamic civilization. The Muslims were the leading scholars between the seventh and fifteenth centuries, and were the heirs of the scientific traditions of Greece, India and Persia.

8 0
2 years ago
In the Fourth Party System, Democrats versus Republicans (GOP), which party was the “liberal” party in terms of wanting to use t
astraxan [27]

Answer:

In the Fourth Party System, the "liberal" party in terms of wanting to use the power of the federal government was the Republican Party, while the "conservative" party was the Democratic Party.

During this political period, which lasted from the 1890s until the presidency of F.D. Roosevelt and his New Deal, the Republican Party dominated politics almost alone at the federal level, establishing through this domination a system of non-interference by the federal government in regulatory matters, thus favoring large companies that, except in matters of monopolies They did not have major regulations and could carry out their activities practically without controls.

3 0
2 years ago
HELP ME
Setler [38]

Answer:

A government's basic functions are providing leadership, maintaining order, providing public services, providing national security, providing economic security, and providing economic assistance.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Was the magma the first document to limit the power of the king of England? True or false
svet-max [94.6K]

Answer:

The correct answer is True

7 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Which city did Japanese leaders confine European trade to?
    6·2 answers
  • What is calligraphy?
    7·2 answers
  • What was illegal in the northwest ordinance and what was encouraged
    10·1 answer
  • 1. How did European exploration and colonization affect Native Americans? How did Europeans view Native Americans?
    15·1 answer
  • The attacks of September 11th, 2001, were preceded by attacks in 1998 on American embassies in Tanzania and. . .
    7·2 answers
  • 03 the cold war at home the big ideas how did the cold war cause the red scare? how did americans respond to the threat of commu
    12·1 answer
  • What rights did the Civil Rights Act of 1866 grant all citizens? Check all of the boxes that apply. answer is the right to own p
    14·2 answers
  • The Brown case was based on the belief that segregation in Topeka's schools violated the "equal protection clause" of the ______
    13·2 answers
  • Which sentence best evaluate the credibility of this historical argument? ​
    5·1 answer
  • Zoom in to read :) ty for the help
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!