Kung ikaw ay bibigyan ng pagkakataong makapamili ng lugar na titirhan, anong mas pipiliin mo, ang manirahan sa

Social Studies

1 answer:

Serggg [28]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Totoo na ang lungsod ay nag-aalok ng napakaraming oportunidad at kapakinabangan na wala sa kanayunan. Halimbawa, ang modernong transportasyon at sistema ng komunikasyon ay mas mahusay sa anumang lungsod kumpara sa isang nayon. Sa isang lungsod may access sa maraming iba't ibang sistema ng transportasyon at may pinakabagong teknolohiya upang makipag-ugnayan; tulad ng cellular telepono, internet, fax atbp. Bukod dito, kapag ang isang bagong teknolohiya ay dumating sa bansa ito ay unang ipinakilala sa lungsod at karaniwang 2/3 taon mamaya sa nayon. Pangalawa, ang mga lungsod ay nagbibigay ng mas mahusay na seguridad sa mga naninirahan tulad ng mga mobile pulis patrols, espesyal na pwersa, pulis ng komunidad, seguridad, mga bantay sa trapiko. Ngunit sa nayon, ang bilang ng mga pwersang pangseguridad ay masyadong mababa kumpara sa kabuuang populasyon. Bukod pa rito, ang mga lungsod ay nagbibigay ng mas mahusay na paggamot, ospital, kwalipikadong doktor, mas mahusay na mga institusyong pang-edukasyon, at amusement parke atbp na talagang hindi maiiwasang mamuno sa mas magandang buhay. Sa maraming pagkakataon, ang mga pasilidad na iyon ay wala o bihira sa isang nayon. Sa aking opinyon, ang dahilan kung bakit ang karamihan sa mga tao ay may posibilidad na manirahan sa isang lungsod ang malawak na oportunidad ng mga trabaho. Karamihan sa mga corporate opisina, industriya, pabrika, opisina ng gobyerno, garments at manufacturing industriya ay maaaring nakatayo sa isang lungsod o malapit sa lungsod. Mas maraming pagkakataon ang mga tao sa trabaho sa isang lungsod kaysa sa isang nayon. Sa kabilang banda, ang mga taong naninirahan sa isang nayon, ay kadalasang napipilitang gumawa ng trabaho na hindi angkop para sa kanya dahil napakakitid ng oportunidad sa trabaho. Muli, ang mga paaralan o kolehiyo ay hindi bang mayroong mas mahusay na kapaligiran, mga lab, guro at kung bakit ang mga mag-aaral sa isang nayon ay maaaring hindi makakuha ng mas magandang edukasyon siya. Kung isasaalang-alang natin ang mga pasilidad ng libangan sa isang lungsod pagkatapos ay may napakaraming pagpipilian tulad ng teatro, parke, art gallery, museo, library parke, library atbp. Ngunit ang mga tao sa mga nayon ay mayroon lamang TV o mga libro at napakaliit na pasilidad para makasukat ng oras.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Amber is going through puberty. she is noticing her breasts are growing and she is developing underarm and pubic hair. these cha

denis-greek [22]

The changes that is happening on Amber is the development of secondary sex characteristics in which an individual undergoing puberty is likely to have changes in his or her private body parts in the body such as the breast and pubic area in some sensitive parts.

4 0

3 years ago

True or false. Pure forms of chemical agents can be colorless and odorless, making them harder to detect. This is a disadvantage

AURORKA [14]

Answer:False , this is actual an advantage to terrorist

Explanation:Terrorist always want to be invisible and be able to get to certain places without being noticed so it makes it easier for them to get in with certain chemical in those places they want to demolish without being noticed , given the fact that pure foam chemical are hard to detect meaning no one will suspect them.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

According to the dynamical systems theory, all of these task characteristics must be considered in studying the individual's per

Viktor [21]

The dynamical systems theory that individual performance can be based on gaining more task, individual socialization and training, and environmental factors. It requires adaptive behavior and movement which becomes the basis for the association of cognitive development through continuous action and manipulation. 

Dynamical systems theory explains that movement is a favorable opportunity for learning, Ex. Reading a book without any prior knowledge and involvement can be difficult. Understanding and giving complex reasoning through statements can be difficult without experience.

3 0

3 years ago

A method for determining whether a product’s design is defective by requiring a court to consider factors such as the gravity of

VikaD [51]

Answer:

Risk-utility test

Explanation:

The risk-utility test is a method used in legal cases to decide if the product design is defective and make the manufacturer responsible. In this test, the product risk is compared to its utility. The product is consider defective and the manufacturer is held responsible if the possibility of an injury is higher than the cost of changing the design to something that is safer.

3 0

3 years ago

Do you think genetic engineering/gene editing is a good thing or a bad thing? Why? Cite 2 pieces of textual evidence to support

AveGali [126]

ART BY THOMAS POROSTOCKYPRO: RESEARCH ON GENE EDITING IN HUMANS MUST CONTINUE

By John Harris

John Harris is professor emeritus in science ethics at University of Manchester, U.K., and the author of How to be Good, Oxford University Press 2016.

In February of this year, the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority in the United Kingdom approved a request by the Francis Crick Institute in London to modify human embryos using the new gene editing technique CRISPR-Cas9. This is the second time human embryos have been employed in such research, and the first time their use has been sanctioned by a national regulatory authority. The scientists at the Institute hope to cast light on early embryo development—work which may eventually lead to safer and more successful fertility treatments.

The embryos, provided by patients undergoing in vitro fertilization, will not be allowed to develop beyond seven days. But in theory—and eventually in practice—CRISPR could be used to modify disease-causing genes in embryos brought to term, removing the faulty script from the genetic code of that person’s future descendants as well. Proponents of such “human germline editing” argue that it could potentially decrease, or even eliminate, the incidence of many serious genetic diseases, reducing human suffering worldwide. Opponents say that modifying human embryos is dangerous and unnatural, and does not take into account the consent of future generations.

6 0

3 years ago