These lines are correct:
<span>The other motive,
Why to a public count I might not go,
Is the great love the general gender bear him;
Who, dipping all his faults in their affection,
Work, like the spring that turneth wood to stone,
so that my arrows,
Too slightly timber'd for so loud a wind,
Would have reverted to my bow again,
But not where I have aim'd them
Here, Claudius is clearly saying that he cannot accuse Hamlet of anything because the people in Denmark love their prince, so even if he did try to accuse him, nobody would believe him anyway. This is why he doesn't want to accuse Hamlet of Polonious's murder like that, but rather reveal the secret in other ways.
</span>
Well! You've got a strong topic, now you just need to get your template down. It's an argumentative essay, so you're going to want an attention-grabbing introduction with your thesis statement. You're going to want body paragraphs that explain both sides of the debate, and then try to convince the reader that your side (the federal gov side) is the best position to take. Wrap it up with a conclusion and voila!
One of your points may be that federal power covers all 50 states, meanwhile state gun laws only govern the individual state. Strict gun laws in Illinois don't matter if it's only a two hour drive to Indiana where they have much looser laws.
Answer:
Paragraphs 4-8 contribute to the development of idea of how witchcraft trials were being conducted in Salem.
Explanation:
Paragraphs 4-8 contribute to the development of idea of how witchcraft trials were being conducted in Salem. Explanation: 'Witchcraft in Salem' is an article by US History. The article predicates the account of witchcraft trials conducted in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692-93.
The correct answer is C. The author's last name.
Citing something is pretty exact and never changes. It is very important to properly cite so as to avoid being accused of plagiarism.
