Answer:
In the aftermath of World War I, Germans struggled to understand their country’s uncertain future. Citizens faced poor economic conditions, skyrocketing unemployment, political instability, and profound social change. While downplaying more extreme goals, Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party offered simple solutions to Germany’s problems, exploiting people’s fears, frustrations, and hopes to win broad support.
Explanation:
https://www.ushmm.org/learn/holocaust/path-to-nazi-genocide/chapter-1/aftermath-of-world-war-i-and-the-rise-of-nazism-1918-1933
Answer:
Laziness
Explanation:
Strategic planning refers to the process of clearly defining the future plan where the company is headed along with specific list of actions, resources allocation, and budgeting that the company need to do to get there.
Strategic planning will most likely be good for every company, but it does not necessarily needed for the company to profit. Often times, the scope of operation was too small for strategic planning to be necessary. (For example, many small restaurants or other forms of small private owned businesses can generate a profit without having to make strategic planning). Laziness is not a valid reason why some of them chose not to do it.
The correct answer is, let’s take the cases of Mexico and Argentina.
Mexico has had a major change of power in the presidency in the last elections of 2018, with the victory of a left-sided party called MORENA. The Revolutionary Party (PRI) governed the country for 70 years. It lost the presidency for the first time in 2000 to the right-sided party called National Action (PAN). In 2012, and due to the bad conditions of the country, official national party PRI won again and had 6 disastrous years that made people angry. Andres Manuel Lopez from MORENA left-sided party won the elections in 2018 with a record-setting 53% of the votes.
The case of Argentina is more critical. The economic situation is very poor and people is getting angry. Since 1991 that the Argentina peso pegged the dollar, things have been worse. President Carlos Menem had two terms both the economic conditions did not improve. The next presidents, Fernando de la Rua and Nestor Kirchner couldn’t do so much and the economy stayed in recession. In a controversial decision, Cristina Kirchnner, wife of former president Nestor, won the election and at the end of her tenure, she was accused of mismanaging of national resources. Mauricio Macri is the actual President and has taken controversial measures that had reduced the money in people’s pockets.
Explanation:
Prithivi Narayan Shah as democratic King:
He initiated the invasion campaign which would eventually make a country called Nepal. Prithivi Narayan Shah is known as a democratic King in the history of the Shah Dynasty because he assumed that the people should have a proper role in the ruling of the state.
Answer:
yes because he'll have 200 over for other stuff
