1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex777 [14]
3 years ago
9

do you think the government is spending too much money on the military? why or why not? btw they spend over $718 billion every y

ear
History
2 answers:
givi [52]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: In my opinion no because all they are doing is to protect the country I think they use the money to buy supplies and emergency funding which is caused by the crisis, natural disaster, or rapid changes in the price of commodities they spend most of the money on training and planning, maintenance of equipment, and most of the military healthcare system

Explanation:  btw I really what to go to the military!!

HOPE IT HELPS !!

SORRY IT TOOK A WHILE

sergeinik [125]3 years ago
6 0
I think the government is spending too much on the military. While people in the richest country on earth are homeless, starving, and becoming crippled with hospital debt while trying to stay alive, the country delegates all of its money to terrorize third world countries and scare others. While having an advanced military is effective, redistributing some funds to domestic issues like the housing crisis and supportive healthcare would make the United States as a whole more united. Arguably, having a secure and cohesive population trumps the need for excessive military weapons.
I hope this helps :)
You might be interested in
Which was a condition that existed in rome around 100 b.c that contributed to the downfall of the republic?
kozerog [31]
The condition that existed in rome around 100 b.c that contributed to the downfall of the republic was : invasions by neighboring city-states
By this time , the Roman already split into separated territories, making it easier to conquer

hope this helps
3 0
3 years ago
How did congressional neutrality towards slavery in the federal territories actually stir up sectional strife
dusya [7]

Answer:

The neutrality of the congress generated polarization in the country. This polarization caused states where slavery was prohibited to criticize and devalue states where slavery was allowed, which retaliated against devaluation with further devaluation.

Explanation:

When Congress decided to stay neutral in relation to slavery in the country, Congressmen believed that this would generate peace in the country, as each state would have autonomy to decide whether it wanted to use slaves or not.

However, the result could not have been more different. Neutrality generated polarization and many conflicts between countries that allowed slaves and prohibited slaves. Countries that did not allow slavery criticized, devalued and tried to interfere with the autonomy of the states that allowed slavery. The slaves who allowed slavery did not tolerate this interference and retaliated as best they could, in addition to promoting a strong devaluation in relation to free countries.

8 0
3 years ago
A source contains a soldier's description of a battle. What kind of source is it? A a secondary source with an understandable po
jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

he was In the battle therefore it's a primary however he also is on one side so he probably has a bias against the other side

7 0
3 years ago
How can a student find out more about core skills such as evaluating arguments which will be applied in the course?
Virty [35]

<span>How can a student find out more about core skills such as evaluating arguments which will be applied in the course?
The correct answer is second one:</span>

<span>
"Select the backpack icon from the lesson viewer and select Web Links."

Which are essential elements to include when naming work and saving it to the course folder? Select all that apply.

</span>

“Unit number and Lesson number”

<span> </span>

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What could have caused U.S. imperialism?
Anna71 [15]

Answer: B) The success of the Spanish-American War and the colonies received from that victory.

The Spanish-American War was a war between the United States and Spain in 1898. The main issue at play in this conflict was that of Cuban independence. The U. S. backed the Cuban rebels that seeked independence. The public was greatly influenced by a media campaign of anti-Spanish sentiments.

The United States eventually emerged victorious, and this meant the loss of the last remnants of the Spanish Empire, which was a great shock to Spain. However, the U. S. gained several territorial possessions, fuelling an interest in expansionism.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What items were wanted by the west during the civil war?
    9·1 answer
  • Wich roman contribution to political theory was adapted by the founding fathers
    15·1 answer
  • What was the biggest benefit of the Space Race ?
    14·1 answer
  • What year was john f kennedy assassinated?
    11·1 answer
  • What idea is the cartoonist expressing when he titled this political cartoon " Rough Sailing Ahead " ?
    8·2 answers
  • The central figure is John Brown. Why does the artist depict him as such a large figure, and why is he standing between the two
    14·1 answer
  • Thomas paine felt that governments were a
    6·1 answer
  • What best explains why conflict has existed between Israelis and Palestinians for over 70 years?
    11·2 answers
  • Which is the correct answer??
    9·1 answer
  • The belief that workers of the world unite to overthrow their oppressors is central to...
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!