1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex777 [14]
3 years ago
9

do you think the government is spending too much money on the military? why or why not? btw they spend over $718 billion every y

ear
History
2 answers:
givi [52]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: In my opinion no because all they are doing is to protect the country I think they use the money to buy supplies and emergency funding which is caused by the crisis, natural disaster, or rapid changes in the price of commodities they spend most of the money on training and planning, maintenance of equipment, and most of the military healthcare system

Explanation:  btw I really what to go to the military!!

HOPE IT HELPS !!

SORRY IT TOOK A WHILE

sergeinik [125]3 years ago
6 0
I think the government is spending too much on the military. While people in the richest country on earth are homeless, starving, and becoming crippled with hospital debt while trying to stay alive, the country delegates all of its money to terrorize third world countries and scare others. While having an advanced military is effective, redistributing some funds to domestic issues like the housing crisis and supportive healthcare would make the United States as a whole more united. Arguably, having a secure and cohesive population trumps the need for excessive military weapons.
I hope this helps :)
You might be interested in
9. Which idea is central to democracy in the United States?
n200080 [17]

Answer:

Freedom needs to be balanced by respect of the law.

7 0
3 years ago
Why did confucius think the family was a good model for chinese society
IRISSAK [1]
Because he thought proper conduct stemmed from family<span>.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Why did Texas leaders and Comanches meet in early 1840?what happened as a result of this meeting
Soloha48 [4]
A peace policy that utilized trade and gifts to promote friendship and authorized military force only to punish specific acts of aggression was inaugurated and remained in effect, with varying degrees of success, for the remainder of Spanish rule in Texas. The first success of the new Spanish policy came <span>in 1762, when Fray José Calahorra y Saenz negotiated a treaty with the Comanches, who agreed not to make war on missionized Apaches. Continued Apache aggression made it impossible for the Comanches to keep their promise, and ultimately led Spanish officials to advocate a Spanish-Comanche alliance aimed at exterminating the Apaches. That policy was officially implemented in 1772, and with the help of Athanase de Mézières, a French trader serving as Spanish diplomat, a second treaty was signed with the Comanches. The Comanche chief Povea signed the treaty in 1772 at San Antonio, thereby committing his band to peace with the Spaniards. Other bands, however, continued to raid Spanish settlements. Comanche attacks escalated in the early 1780s, and Spanish officials feared the province of Texas would be lost. To avoid that possibility, the governor of Texas, Domingo Cabello y Robles, was instructed to negotiate peace with the warring Comanches. He dispatched Pedro Vial and Francisco Xavier de Chaves to Comanchería with gifts and proposals for peace. The mission was successful, and the emissaries returned to San Antonio with three principal Comanche chiefs who were authorized by their people to make peace with the Spanish. The result was the Spanish-Comanche Treaty of 1785, a document that Comanches honored, with only minor violations, until the end of the century. As Spanish power waned in the early years of the nineteenth century, officials were unable to supply promised gifts and trade goods, and Comanche aggression once again became commonplace. Comanches raided Spanish settlements for horses to trade to Anglo-American traders entering Texas from the United States. Those Americans furnished the Comanches with trade goods, including arms and ammunition, and provided a thriving market for Comanche horses.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Help Me Please it's important
OLga [1]
This is the answer for slit

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What led the majority of white new englanders to settle on puget sound
seraphim [82]
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the third choice :fishing"


The Puget Sound<span> region is a coastal area of the Pacific Northwest in the U.S. state of Washington, including </span>Puget Sound<span>, the </span>Puget Sound<span> lowlands, and the surrounding region roughly west of the Cascade Range and east of the Olympic Mountains.</span>

I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Berlin crisis of 1961 was precipitated by Soviet Premier Khrushchev's threat to __________. A. Place nuclear missiles in Eas
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following was NOT a military technology used in World War I?
    10·1 answer
  • List 2-3 ways that the Chinese Dynasties were different from the Ottoman and Mughal Empires.
    5·1 answer
  • HELP PLZ ASAP
    7·2 answers
  • What are some of the immediate results of the battlefields civil war?
    10·1 answer
  • What is a totalitarian dictator *
    8·2 answers
  • Legislative Branch - Web Quest
    13·1 answer
  • 2.sino ang
    7·1 answer
  • How do you think Christians justified the Crusades ?
    8·1 answer
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%20%20%5Ctextless%20%5C%20br%20%2F%5C%20%20%5Ctextgreater%20%5C%20%7B%5Clarge%7B%5Cred%7B%5
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!