Answer:
Through its prior delimitation of the candidates for Chief Executive, the government of the People's Republic of China limits the right of its citizens to the free election of their representatives. In other words, it previously delimits this right, prohibiting its citizens from choosing candidates who do not belong to the Communist Party, with which their decision-making power is severely limited. This situation directly attacks the concept of democracy, which implies the free and unrestrained election of representatives by the citizens of a country.
It was a imperial examination in Song Dynasty (later on), but in Han Confucianism was hella on, so u need dat knowledge to be in gov. A lot of goverment after Qin Dynasty (previous dynasty) was adopted. So the Emperor had all the power, and all the "jobs" cam down on familly line. So pretty much be wealthy, know confucianism, and have a father who was in the gov, or if the emporer chose u, and u must have a d!(k. Okey, just googled in wiki to be sure and it's says "the states made by the emperor were assigned to official dedication..." So I guess emperor chose the gov, but all of them had to be educated. Sooo if that helps, hard question though.
THEY WHERE FORCE TO LIVE IN TEXAS
In the elections of 1800, Thomas Jefferson was elected by the House of Representatives over Aaron Burr.
In 1800 the presidential elections were held, these being the fourth presidential elections of the United States. In this election, John Adams (Federalist Party) and Thomas Jefferson (Democratic-Republican Party) faced each other.
The result of this election was Jefferson's victory over Adams. However, in the election, the Electoral College in charge of electing the president and vice president resulted in a voting tie between Jefferson and Aaron Burr for which the House of Representatives had to choose and the result of this election was Thomas Jefferson.
Learn more about Thomas Jefferson in: brainly.com/question/3248960
Answer:
The US war on drugs and its legacy in Latin America ... The legacy of the US-funded war on drugs in Latin America is profound even as its impact has been ... to dictate the implementation of policy as it did in the 70s and 80s.
Explanation:
google said it
