I think yes but I would look it up
Answer:
D. It did not give the Confederation Congress a way to raise money
by collecting taxes.
Explanation:
They made it too difficult for the government to raise money through taxes and duties. Congress had not have the power to tax. The national Congress was denied the power to tax, so it could not pay for the army and navy needed to defend the nation.
Some weaknesses are the inability to control money or military, as well as not being able to act unless called for by a case. However some strengths they have are that they have the power to interpret the constitution as well as being able to shape public policy.
Answer:
a. How will the $20,000 payments be treated by Fred and Tammy if covered by prior law? b. How will the payments be treated if the divorce is covered by new law? c. What is Tammy's basis in the residence? d. What role would a tax adviser play in a divorce?
Explanation:
a. For Fred, the 20,000 must be included in income. There is no deduction for paying alimony. For Tammy, the amount is not included in income.
b. If the divorce was complete prior to December 31, 2018, Fred can deduct the $20,000 payments as alimony.
If the divorce was complete prior to December 31, 2018, Tammy must include the $20,000 payments in gross income.
c. It's $100.000,00
d. Tax advisors are responsible for determining the value of property given in lieu of cash for an alimony payment.
