1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SpyIntel [72]
3 years ago
5

T

Law
1 answer:
Anvisha [2.4K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

the law is above everything and everyone in a country thus it controls every aspect of society, government, groups, code of conduct of people and business

You might be interested in
In the U.S. over 2 million people are injurand around 33,000 people are killed in traffic collisions ________.
sveta [45]

Answer:

each year

Explanation:

please mark me as brainliest

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain why Article I of the Constitution prevents a president of the United States from enacting a federal budget on his or her
ELEN [110]

Answer:

This is to ensure that there are enough checks and balances in the system to prevent the country’s decisions from being solely taken by just an individual in order to prevent mismanagement of public funds.

Explanation:

In the Article I of the US Constitution there is a provision that prevents the president from enacting a federal budget on his or her own, without the consent of other branches of the federal government.

This is to ensure financial accountability and prevent the high risk of misappropriation of funds if the President had the sole power to do so.

4 0
3 years ago
Is it assited s*icide or is it considered murder?
ra1l [238]

Answer:

Murder

Explanation:

No matter what excuse someone may have, or even if the su!cide victim gave the person permission and even confirmed via video-tape or recording, it is still, technically, murder since you were involved in the happening.

4 0
3 years ago
What’s the importance of Steagald v United States? And do you agree with the decision?
nlexa [21]

Answer:

The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.

Explanation:

According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.

7 0
2 years ago
Need help with drivers Ed questions
poizon [28]

Answer:

traditional and non traditional intersections

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What does it mean “speed enforced by aircraft”?
    15·1 answer
  • Qué relación puedes establecer en las siguientes palabras? igualda, apego a la legalidad, no discriminación
    7·1 answer
  • A child was abducted from a local restaurant. Police closed the restaurant while they
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    5·1 answer
  • can someone please tell me one law that can be Breck and you will not go to jail A there are no law like that B .......... C I t
    11·1 answer
  • Why is it important to frame your legal argument around as many
    5·1 answer
  • Pick a case where police used deadly force and present the facts to the class. You may want to review the Continuum of Force Pyr
    6·1 answer
  • Can a teacher threaten a student to slap in India?​
    14·1 answer
  • If you are convicted of a DUI, this event will have a serious impact on your family. a) True b) False
    15·2 answers
  • What are the five laws of demand? Choose 1 law and give an example in society: help please
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!