This is one of the main axes of existentialist philosophy. Camus puts emphasis on how nothing intrinsically matters. We are the only ones that can give meaning to the world and thus the world is just a tool for us and our consciousness, we are completely alienated from it on a basic level. The concepts of freedom and the crowd are not mentioned and the concept of philosophy as a way of life is too vague to capture this. The correct answer is c.
According to the fragment it can be inferred that the correct answer is "moving form the details of the individual hieroglyphics..." (option c).
<h3>How to identify the idea of the fragment?</h3>
To identify the idea of the fragment we must take into account the central theme and the details that support this idea. Regarding this fragment, the interpretation that a person made about the hieroglyphs once he saw them is related.
In this case, this person was able to interpret the hieroglyphs as representing both sounds and symbols. (option C).
Learn more about hieroglyphs in: brainly.com/question/441873
#SPJ1
Answer:
A feminist analysis would focus on how the men discuss Mrs. Ochuba. A historical analysis would focus on whether using a native doctor was considered superstitious at the time and place the story depicts.
Explanation:
In order to answer this we need to define the terms "feminist analysis" and "historical analysis". While both of them are types of analysis of literary work, they differ in goals.
Feminist analysis focuses on analyzing in what manner women are presented in literature and also the role of gender in the character's actions and development.
On the other hand, historical analysis is the method used to help us understand the past. It focuses on examining a literature work and by doing so, learning about everyday life, tradition, customs and connecting it to a certain place and period in time.
I believe the answer would be A ^^
