1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
victus00 [196]
3 years ago
13

What are three reasons why bostonians felt the British pushed them too far

History
1 answer:
Scilla [17]3 years ago
3 0
One the soldiers acted very mean to the British people second some of the British workers earned money and lastly they were some who stole goods from local shops
You might be interested in
S Why do you believe the sponsors of the Johnson-Reed Act chose
nlexa [21]

The aim of the Johnson-Reed Act was to limit the annual number of immigrants that would be admitted from any individual country into its sphere.

<h3>What is the Johnson-Reed Act known as?</h3>

The Johnson-Reed Act is also called the Immigration Act

The legislation is a federal law that limits the number of immigrants that will be allow to enter the U.S. through a national origins quota.

<h3>Why Johnson-Reed Act chose 1890 as the census year?</h3>

The year 1890 was choosen as the census year to favor the immigrants from northern and Western Europe and preserve the homogeneity of the nation.

In conclusion, the legislation limited the annual number of immigrants that would be admitted from any individual country into its sphere.

Read more about Johnson Reed Act

<em>brainly.com/question/9437296</em>

8 0
2 years ago
1. [Part A] Which statement is true about the Aztecs and the Spaniards? *
ololo11 [35]

Answer:

The answer is D, The Spaniards took advantage of the Aztecs.

Explanation:

The Aztecs thought that the Spaniards where their gods, who where white figures coming to take residence in the empire and if the Aztecs did not give them what they wanted they would be killed by the Spaniards. So the Spaniards took all their lavish clothes and gold. The Spaniards kept this up for a while but eventually the Spaniards attacked and destroyed the Aztecs.

4 0
4 years ago
Why did proponents of the torture memo believe that waterboarding was an acceptable interrogation technique?
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

The proponents of the suffering memo believe that waterboarding was an acceptable interrogation technique because They claimed that the president had the authority to do whatever he thought necessary to get information in the global war on terrorism.

<h3> What is waterboarding ?</h3>
  • Waterboarding is a form of torture in which water is poured over a cloth protecting the face and breathing passages of an immobilized captive, causing the person to experience the feeling of drowning.
  • In the most common method of waterboarding, the captive's face is coated with cloth or some other thin material and immobilized on their back at an angle of 10 to 20 degrees
  • Torturers pour water onto the face over the breathing passages, generating an almost instantaneous gag reflex and creating a drowning sensation for the captive

To learn more about waterboarding, refer

brainly.com/question/1463044

#SPJ9

8 0
2 years ago
The war Hawks wanted to fight Britain in the earty 1800s in order to
Andrews [41]

The war hawks wanted to fight Britain in the early 1800's in order to: Gain British territory

Not only that, they also did it to defend american rights and revenge on the manhandling case of the American sailors.

Hope This Helps!             Have A Nice Night!!

5 0
4 years ago
What is the Ruling in the Supreme Court Case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, and how does it defend your
Assoli18 [71]

The resolution of the Supreme Court Case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette was a landmark decision reached by the court, which stated that the right of freedom of speech provided by the First Amendment legimated students to refuse to salute the US flag or to spout the  The Pledge of Allegiance of the flag if they attended a public school. It is therefore not mandatory, and more important, not considered a criminal offence to refuse to perform publicly patriotic demonstration acts.

The court victory was achieved by the Jehovah's Witnesses who, due to the prescriptions of their religion, could not salute or pledge to symbols. The Supreme Court ruling decided that the state should not have the power to oblige citizens to express themselves in a certain manner. Therefore, it is a clear defense to the right of speech, and it proves how the legal and judicial instruments guarantee it for citizens.



8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain how women and african americans were affected by the postwar economy
    10·2 answers
  • The conservative movement in the united states in the 1960s and 1970s called for lowering taxes. cutting defense spending. incre
    6·2 answers
  • Television coverage hurt the civil rights movement in Selma.<br><br> A.<br> Yes<br><br> B.<br> No
    11·1 answer
  • What did the 5,000 men involved with the civilian conservation corps (ccc) mainly focus on in Oklahoma
    6·2 answers
  • For what purpose was Harvard College originally founded? to train teachers to train tradesmen to train ministers to train lawyer
    6·2 answers
  • Ln the year 1890 approximately ehat percentage of the total us population live in the west
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement is NOT TRUE about English settlement in North America?
    12·1 answer
  • Aquatic biomes are greatly influenced by:
    7·2 answers
  • Can someone Please help me lI’ll give Brainlist!
    10·1 answer
  • 14.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!