Original, creative work of an artist or inventor is called intellectual property.
Explanation:
Intellectual property of a person or a company is the part of their product that is protected by copyright or patent and cannot be reproduced without permission from them.
This means that they have the right to earn money from it and ecide where it will be and where it will not be.
Intellectual property has to be original and something that germinates out of a new idea for a new product or something that has not been created in that way before.
Answer:
b. Each decision variable must be non-negative in the optimal solution.
Explanation:
This constraint or restriction states that x11, x12, x21, and x22 all must be at least 0 or greater. in other words, they cannot be negative numbers. If the restriction had been > (greater than), then it would mean that all the variables must be positive numbers. But since it is ≥ (greater than or equal to), 0 is a valid option.
Answer:
<u>Social consequence entrepreneurship</u><u> </u>
Explanation:
A social consequence entrepreneurship refers to a kind of business which aims at profit making at the same time driven by the motive of creating a positive social impact.
These refer to those ventures created with an object of tackling and overcoming social issues and at the same time create a positive social change.
These could be both profit making or not for profit organizations, though the majority of them belong to the latter category.
In the given case, Sword and Plough hire army veterans to create products and donates ten percent of the profits it earns to veteran organizations. Thus, the company aims at making profits and at the same time serve and benefit a particular segment of customers. Thus, this is an example of Social consequence entrepreneurship.
In the body of her letter I think she should start talking about her past experience with jobs and her experience with whatever jobs she's worked for before,
Answer:
assessing the costs and benefits of the research.
Explanation:
When a researcher embarks on a project and discovers that the costs of collecting the primary data overruns the benefits to be derived from the research, the researcher should reconsider whether to collect the primary data or not. Researchers regularly assess the costs and benefits of collecting primary data before fully embarking on data collection. If the costs outweighs the benefits of the data collected, then it is not beneficial to use primary data. Instead, the researcher can rely on secondary data. For every project, the costs and benefits are important considerations that determine whether a research or project goes ahead or not.
