Explanation:
dear frnd
hi how r u. hope u r doing fit and fine like me. I'm sorry i didn't send to a letter for such a long time. during those days i was so busy because of the school projects nd stuff.
soo let me spill the tea. today I'm writing to this letter to u to let u know abt the festival that the people in our village celebrate. (u can explain the festival u celebrate shortly).
I wish i could tell u more but right now i have to go. my mom is calling me so i guess it's time to say goodbye. take care.
sincerely (ur name)
Answer:
Caesar asked Cassius to jump into the river with him.
Cassius leapt into the river and Caesar followed.
Caesar needed Cassius to save him from drowning.
Explanation:
According to the excerpt from Julius Caesar, act 1, scene 2, it is narrated that one day, Caesar asks Cassius to take a swim with him, to which Cassius agrees and they swim for quite a while.
The details that should be included in a paraphrase of the passage are given as:
Caesar asked Cassius to jump into the river with him.
Cassius leapt into the river and Caesar followed.
Caesar needed Cassius to save him from drowning.
A supporting detail is used to validate a claim to prove that the claim is indeed true.
A claim on the other hand is a statement made by an author about something which can either be true or false.
Let me give you an example of a claim and how supporting details can be used:
- All tall boys are smarter than shorter boys
- America has a population of 30 million people
- The Earth is round
Now, because i made these claims, i have to provide supporting details to backup this claim.
To do this, i would have to bring reputable sources which contains the figures which would be my supporting details.
I could bring the population figures from an independent reliable source to prove that America indeed has a population of 30 million people.
Please note that your question is incomplete which made me to give you a general overview so that you can understand the concept.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/9070383
You didn't give the options. However, i'll try.
To me, a stone cannot be ethical because it cannot suffer. Indeed, the capacity for suffering must be satisfied before we talk about interest in a meaningful way. For instance, nothing we could possibly do for a stone could make a difference in its welfare. It don't have interest. Whereas, we, humans have interest. Therefore we can be ethical because we are sentient beings that can be benifited or harmed. It's because we can experience pain as a result.
Hope this helps !
Photon
In the very, very simplest terms, judging the validity of an argument starts centers around this process:
1) Identify the rhetoric (Lines of Argument) from the actual, formal reasons. Separate the persuasive language from the actual claims to truth and fact.
2) Analyze those reasons (claims to truth and fact) by identifying their logic (often in the Implicit Reasons) and evidence.
3) Test and evaluate the logic and evidence; identify logical errors and ask whether the evidence can and has been tested and objectively, repeatedly, factually verified.
