Answer:
The power the government has over the military and other armed forces is extense. The government could use the military to stop a social movement or a strike. In terms of sheer ability, the government can order the military to act, and be held responsible for the consequences. However, under the Rule of Law, the government does not have the political authority to do so. As it cannot act against the rights and liberties of people. The Rule of Law prevents precisely that: an arbitrary action from the government against its own citizens. The moment a government uses its power arbitrarily and without political authority, the Rule of Law is broken.
Explanation:
the u.s.s.r sputnik was the first
Morris is in favor of the Three-fifths Compromise because of the indispensible necessity of making the Executive independent of the Legislature body.
<h3>What was the
Three-fifths Compromise?</h3>
The Compromise determined that each slave would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of apportioning taxes and representation; it compromise granted a disproportionate political power to Southern slave states.
According to the excerpt from September 4, 1787, by Gouverneur Morris, he is favor of the Three-fifths Compromise because of the indispensible necessity of making the Executive independent of the Legislature body.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about Three-fifths Compromise
brainly.com/question/2144004
#SPJ1
The bering strait is the land bridge
