Answer:
The author points to Levitt and Smith, as well as Marshll as inspirations for using numbers to investigate problems because:
they made efort to connect their works with real world problems.
Thinking like them offer to sports analysis
That numbers will sometimes disprove conventional wisdom
Explanation:
The studies on sports efficacy under economical and statistical models to obtain a coefficient of price over win is a revolutionary approach to calculate the number of resources a team needs to use to win. This approach has managed to find efficacy in teams as a whole and the contribution of players in the system as an effective system. It has enhanced analysts and researchers the ability to understand when the team can use its resources in its best way. This has left behind conventional wisdom on players and teams to bring statistical approaches and knowledge based on deductions to find efficacy in real-world sports problems.
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Answer:
5 subtracted from b.
Explanation:
5 is being subtracted from b. My answer just simplifies this statement.
Answer:
La importancia es que todas las personas tienen derecho a tener nacionalidad para tener la protección de un Estado y la nacionalidad colombiana genera el vínculo entre las personas que nacen en Colombia, los que obtienen la nacionalidad por adopción o los hijos de colombianos nacidos en el exterior con el estado colombiano.
A small group is similar to an open system in that they are influenced by environmental forces such as cultural, social and economic.
<h3 /><h3>What is systems theory?</h3>
It is the understanding that an effective system must be integrated to all its parts, which generates cohesion, learning and greater coverage of the factors that are interconnected to achieve a common objective.
Therefore, systems theory is related to an open system because it is comprehensive, expansive and integrated with a set of parts that together will determine its performance.
Find out more about systems theory here:
brainly.com/question/8152254
#SPJ1
