Answer:Competency to stand trial (CST), according to the Dusky standard, has two basic components to its definition. The first component refers to the accused<u> individual's </u><u>Ability to interact rationally with an attorney</u> The second component refers to the accused individual's <u>understanding how the court process work.</u>
Explanation:
Competency to Stand Trial is a a legal construct that states that an individual or defendant should be able to understand the nature, reason and purpose of a legal proceedings against him and should be able to effectively interact rationally with an attorney or counsel in his defense. Such defendant should be able to understand the type of charges against him or her , the court room and the participants included, also he should be able to cooperate with his attorney by giving details to in terms of facts including reasons and causes of his actions for offence alleged on him or her so as to enable the attorney challenge witnesses on his behalf
Only an individual who does not show a mental disorder or defect can understand this conditions and cooperate with an attorney, In cases where individuals try to feign mental disorder, a Psychological testing is carried out so as to show competency for such individual to stand trial .
Answer:
Technically the answer would probably be C.4th Amendment/violated
Explanation:
However if the student is suspicious then the school has every right to check their bag because of concerns. For this specific question C is the answer but based on personal experience that really doesn't make sense to put it.
Answer:
On July 4, 1776, the Congress issued the Declaration of Independence, which for the first time asserted the colonies' intention to be fully independent of the mother country. The Congress established itself as the central governing authority under the Articles of Confederation, which remained in force until 1788.
Explanation:
Mark me brainly please.
Answer: no
Explanation: if the government didn't protect the peoples rights then the people can throw out the government and replace a new and better one to the peoples liking since its well known in the constitution that the people have the power to do so, like the magna carta where the government (king) at the time abused power and gave cruel and usual punishments. The government cannot go against the people or take there rights (John Locke - the social contract) its also why we have our bill of rights to secure our rights for the government does not violate us and rule of law where nobody is above the law. The government would only go to great lengths if it was a issue the people suggest they look into, other then that the government does not go to far lengths for there citizens unless they get called out for it.
