Answer:
Explanation:
From the given information:
In Flinstone company;
The old ownership = 2400/(2400+200) = 50%
New onwership = 1920/(1920 + 2400) = 44.4%
The reduction in Wilma ownership in Flinstone company is from 50% to 44.4%
Dividend amount perceived by WIlma is:
$30700 × 480 shares = $14,736,000
The responsibility of Wilma in the wake of taking the redemption is in reality more than the 40% (80% x 50%), so she fails the considerably disproportionate test.
Hence, dividend recognition = $1,47,36,000
b)
Wilma's personal income tax expense premise in excess shares can be determined by summing back the unused tax premise of 480 offers reclaimed to the premise of her leftover offers 1920.
unused tax premise of 480 shares = 480 × $7900 = $37,92,000
premises of the remaining shares = 1920 × $7900 = $1,51,68,000
In the remaining shares, WIlma income tax = $37,92,000 + $1,51,68,000
= $1,89,60,000
c)
Flintstone will make the decrease in its E&P by a measure of profit perceived by Wilma =$1,47,36,000
