1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Levart [38]
2 years ago
10

Explain an example of a Progressive reform at either the local, state, or national level in each of the following areas:

Advanced Placement (AP)
2 answers:
julsineya [31]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

An example of a Progressive reform at either the local, state, or national level is described below in details.

Explanation:

The principal purposes of the Progressive movement were discussing difficulties generated by urbanization, industrialization, political corruption, and immigration. The movement essentially targeted political organizations and their administrators. Reformers desired legislation to defend workers and poor people, to reform administration, and to regulate business.

Ronch [10]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Answer Below

Explanation:

The principal purposes of the Progressive movement were discussing difficulties generated by urbanization, industrialization, and political corruption. The movement essentially targeted political organizations and their administrators. Reformers desired legislation to defend workers and poor people, to reform administration, protect natural resources, and regulate business. They reformed businesses to give more economic opportunities to all, all people should have the same level of advantages. They provided union rights for workers, such as the right to get paid when injured. They broke up monopolies, reduced tariffs so that there could be a decrease in costs for consumers. They protected and conserved natural resources, and reformed the government. 

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP FAST I AM BEING TIMED
EastWind [94]

In the fourth paragraph, the author mentions what he "gained from the dialogue” and what he "got from Sheridan” (lines 29–30) primarily to <u>illustrate his developing arguments against slavery and validate his beliefs</u>

Although your question is incomplete, I made use of the context clues to come to a conclusion of the most plausible meaning based on the words shown and this was to validate his beliefs about the issue of slavery.

<h3>What is a Narration?</h3>

This refers to the storytelling that is done with the aid of a narrator and this helps to advance the plot.

Hence, we can see that In the fourth paragraph, the author mentions what he "gained from the dialogue” and what he "got from Sheridan” (lines 29–30) primarily to <u>illustrate his developing arguments against slavery and validate his beliefs</u>

Although your question is incomplete, I made use of the context clues to come to a conclusion of the most plausible meaning based on the words shown and this was to validate his beliefs about the issue of slavery.

Read more about narration here:

brainly.com/question/1934766

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
What history lessons did Hitler forget in 1941? Explain.
kotegsom [21]

Explanation:

I'm not sure there is any direct evidence that it was strategically a bad idea. Strategically it made sense to attack the Soviet Union while they were weak and unprepared for war. Hitler knew that as he made progress on the Western front that Stalin grew more and more nervous every day about the growing power of Nazi Germany.

What must be remembered is that Hitler almost won the war with the Soviet Union. Hitler felt the army was not moving fast enough towards Moscow. If Hitler's commanders had done what Hitler had wanted, which was rush as fast to Moscow as possible, then it is possible the Soviet Union would have fallen without time to prepare a massive infantry army. Germany's army was also not prepared for fighting in cold weather. It was not expected that the Soviet Union was even close to capable of fighting back. The Soviet Union's army was in shambles throughout the entire war. It was ill-equipped and all it had to offer was quantity over quality.

The combination of the cold, unexpected resistance and the amount of time it was taking to get to Moscow because of cold weather and resistance was setting back Germany. The whole strategy was to get in and occupy Moscow and take the leadership. It took about six months for the Germans to get nearly to the gates of Moscow, when the tide finally started to turn at Stalingrad. Hitler most importantly underestimated the sheer will of the the country to defend itself no matter how much the cost in blood. The Soviet Union lost a whopping 13.5% of its population to the war.

So in short, strategically a lot of it made sense at the time. The operation was blundered because the blitzkrieg was not fast enough, the underestimation of the kind of force the Soviet Union could pull together and an underestimation of the cold winter. The plan was also delayed because of setbacks in the Balkans and helping the Italians out where they had failed.

It's hard to find actual strategic proof of what was going on through Hitler's mind and his advisors to take on this risky operation. We do know however that these had been a part of Hitler's plans for years. In my opinion, it was probably thought at the time the odds were in Nazi Germany's favor. In all reality, the Germans had a pretty good chance of winning the war within six months, perhaps if just a few variables had changed they might have actually pulled it off. If they could have gotten there a month earlier, they probably would have won.

Also Great Britain was absolutely in no position to put up any kind of resistance except for the occasional bombing run, which was producing much larger losses than they could keep up with equipment wise.

Also Stalin and Hitler were not real allies, they only had a non-aggression pact, and both were not exactly known to be trustworthy. Stalin was also at many times gullible and Hitler took advantage of this diplomatically. Even when warned that Germany was going to invade, Stalin dismissed his advisers.

Taking in all these factors, the thought probably never occurred to Hitler and his officers that the Soviet Union would ever be able to launch any kind of counter attack. It took quite some time and the United States to intervene for the Soviet Union to really begin its successful counter-offensive.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What magma is in composite volcanoes
leonid [27]

Answer:

Composite volcanoes have felsic magma.

In this layers stack over each other during eruption.

hope it helps!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which one of the following tools would be provided to construction electricians by an electrical contractor?
LenaWriter [7]

IT should be <u><em>C. SCREDEIVERS</em></u>

5 0
3 years ago
Trial balance question... can someone pls help me...​
valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

20

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Write at least one page detailing a solution to the tragedy of the commons.
    6·1 answer
  • Name one reason why it is important to indicate on the check to whom the cheque was made out to?
    8·1 answer
  • 100 points up for grabs and brainiest
    13·1 answer
  • Two men walk down a street. They pass a jail. One man sees a person in the jail. He tells the other man: "Brothers and sisters I
    14·1 answer
  • if an earthquake occurs in the interior of South America, what can be inferred about the geology of that area?
    8·1 answer
  • For each or the following cases explain why you would either approve or dissaprove the proposed research experiments
    14·1 answer
  • How does size and shape have no effect on density of matter?
    8·1 answer
  • How do you ask a guy to date them?????<br> HELP PLZZZZ<br> I need this
    11·1 answer
  • Why is it significant that the famed Great Wall of China that we see today was actually constructed by the Ming Dynasty in the E
    14·1 answer
  • What will be next in sequence
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!