Appeal to emotion or argumentum ad passiones or appeal to feels is a logical fallacy characterized by the manipulation of the recipient's emotions in order to win an argument, especially in the absence of factual evidence.[1] This kind of appeal to emotion is a type of red herring and encompasses several logical fallacies, including appeal to consequences, appeal to fear, appeal to flattery, appeal to pity, appeal to ridicule, appeal to spite, and wishful thinking.
Instead of facts, persuasive language is used to develop the foundation of an appeal to emotion-based argument. Thus, the validity of the premises that establish such an argument does not prove to be verifiable.[2]
Appeals to emotion are intended to draw visceral feelings from the acquirer of the information. And in turn, the acquirer of the information is intended to be convinced that the statements that were presented in the fallacious argument are true; solely on the basis that the statements may induce emotional stimulation such as fear, pity and joy. Though these emotions may be provoked by an appeal to emotion fallacy, effectively winning the argument, substantial proof of the argument is not offered, and the argument's premises remain invalid.
Answer:
B. She is able to draw on her experience and make the account more suspenseful and vivid.
Explanation:
Cox’s perspective makes the account of the arctic swim more suspenseful and vivid as she draw on her experience. Her personal experience gives readers a more enriching information about the artic swim. From the given excerpt, her first hand experience makes the account more clearer and well clarified for every reader. In fact, it creates suspense for readers and makes the readers looking out for what will happen next.
Stories are enriching if told by the person who had the first hand experience.
1. His father is dead
2. He has not become king himself
3. He is depressed and suicidal
The following types of conflicts between Romeo vs. Tybalt, Mercutio vs. Tybalt, Mercutio vs. Romeo, Mercutio vs. Mercutio, Romeo vs. Verona, Juliet vs. Lord Capulet, Juliet vs. Juliet, in Romeo and Juliet.
Tybalt plans to get revenge by battling Romeo, but when Romeo declines, he kills Mercutio, Romeo's closest friend. When Tybalt asks for a word with him, the irascible Mercutio responds, "Make it a word and a blow," in keeping with form.
According to the critic Stephen Greenblatt, Mercutio is a force in the play that serves to undermine the likelihood of romantic love and the influence of tragic destiny. Lord Capulet is a little bit of a dictator after his violently unpleasant reaction to Juliet's "disobedience."
In the lengthy argument with Juliet over whether or not she will wed Paris, the physical violence is most obvious.
To know more about Romeo and Juliet here
brainly.com/question/10468114
#SPJ1
