The statement basically states “Books should show us the real world and not a fantasy where we are thought to believe things. It must guide us in our time on Earth.” You are supposed to provide your opinion on what you think.
I would write something like this:
Literature has been around for centuries, maybe even millenniums. It has brought people out of the depths of despair and helped them over come problems in day-to- day life. There are all kinds of books out there - fantasy, adventure, romance, but should all those books be forgotten and thrown out for man only to read non-fictional books that are factual rather than interesting?
On one hand, books should be used as a tool for living. They should be informative and contain facts that could benefit us through out our lifetime. An interesting quote is, ‘Knowledge is the key to life’ therefore reading non-fiction books will help us in the future and reflect our actions when we grow up.
On the other hand, books have been brought to life to transport a person away from his troubles into a fictional world, where they are happy and blissful. Taking away such books and reading only factual information will not benefit a humans mind, for they will grow old and grumpy; they will obtain a lot of information but they will be dissatisfied with life - so what is the point of that? Moreover, books are books. No matter the genre or the origination of the book, it will teach us grammar and vocabulary which is vital for a human to know; it will make us emotionally happy and we will still gain knowledge from it.
In my opinion, Forster is wrong because a work of literature MUST provide a scope for the imagination and it must alter reality a little but for us to imagine - for without imagination, we are nothing.
I hope this helps, and please tell me what grade you got as I would love to know:))
Objects that have a meaning to them
Answer:
I think it is Mobile phone
Explanation:
Answer:
C) by giving an example of how Mary Beth Tinker did, in fact, disrupt her mathematics class
.
Explanation:
Petitioner John F. Tinker, 15 years of age, and solicitor Christopher Eckhardt, 16 years of age, went to secondary schools in Des Moines, Iowa. Candidate Mary Beth Tinker, John's sister, was a 13-year-old understudy in middle school.
In December 1965, a gathering of grown-ups and understudies in Des Moines held a gathering at the Eckhardt home. The gathering resolved to pitch their complaints to the threats in Vietnam and their help for a détente by wearing dark armbands amid the Christmas season and by fasting on December 16 and New Year's Eve. Candidates and their folks had recently occupied with comparable exercises, and they chose to take part in the program.
The principals of the Des Moines schools wound up mindful of the arrangement to wear armbands. On December 14, 1965, they met and received a strategy that any understudy wearing an armband to class would be approached to expel it, and on the off chance that he declined he would be suspended until he returned without the armband. Candidates knew about the guideline that the school specialists embraced.
On December 16, Mary Beth and Christopher wore dark armbands to their schools. John Tinker wore his armband the following day. They were altogether sent home and suspended from school until they would return without their armbands. They didn't come back to class until after the arranged period for wearing armbands had lapsed - that is, until after New Year's Day.
Answer:
she was the first person to win a Nobel peace prize for her degree in physics and chemsitry
